Yes. Rex Martin was the best teacher I have ever had. Very inspiring also. But remember: paralysis by analysis; the sound is most important. Hearing the sound you want, and what Sean first said about just spending a lot of time with louder dbs will give you most of what you are looking for.I appreciate the kind words, but I am highly influenced by my studies at Northwestern University with Rex Martin, a Jacobs disciple, and by numerous recordings and videos and masterclass notes I studied while there. I may have butchered some of Mr. Jacobs teachings. The better teachers of this are direct students of Jacobs such as Rex Martin, David Fedderly, Floyd Cooley, and the like.
Playing loud
- randy westmoreland
- pro musician

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 9:41 am
- Location: Holt MI
I saw ghost riders in the sky, and they each played a York EEb tuba.
Instructor of tuba and euphonium, Alma College
Instructor of tuba and euphonium, Alma College
-
happyroman
- 3 valves

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: Evanston, IL
Dynamics on a brass instrument are partially (or predominantly) a function of the air speed; to play louder, move the air faster; to play softer, move the air more slowly.
However, as stated above, the air pressure should remain low. Think about blowing the air fast, but not blowing hard.
A good analogy is to think about a stringed instrument. To play louder, the bow moves quickly across the strings, but the player does not want to grind the bow into the strings.
The other point to keep in mind is to have a good concept of what you want to sound like, and strive to match the sound in your head.
A good model for this, to me, is Gene Pokorney. His sound never changes regardless of register or dynamic, it's always great. It's just like changing the volume on a great stereo. There's either more or less sound, but not altered sound.
Just a note to the statement I made above. Sorry, I did not mean to indicate that Gene's sound never changes at all, only that it is aways great, regardless of register, and especially, dynamic.
However, as stated above, the air pressure should remain low. Think about blowing the air fast, but not blowing hard.
A good analogy is to think about a stringed instrument. To play louder, the bow moves quickly across the strings, but the player does not want to grind the bow into the strings.
The other point to keep in mind is to have a good concept of what you want to sound like, and strive to match the sound in your head.
A good model for this, to me, is Gene Pokorney. His sound never changes regardless of register or dynamic, it's always great. It's just like changing the volume on a great stereo. There's either more or less sound, but not altered sound.
Just a note to the statement I made above. Sorry, I did not mean to indicate that Gene's sound never changes at all, only that it is aways great, regardless of register, and especially, dynamic.
Last edited by happyroman on Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Andy
- Leland
- pro musician

- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
- Location: Washington, DC
There's a lot more to it than bore size. The King sousaphone I used in college (smallest valve section bore of all the tubas in the building) could get ridiculously loud without sounding broken, but my old .890" Zeiss Mirafone-look-alike would go bad at a significantly quieter volume.schlepporello wrote:Would not the bore size have an influence on the amount of volume you would be able to "cleanly" produce?
I'll contest the point that Mr. Pokorny sounds the same at all dynamics in all registers. If the bell were aimed at you during, say, the Fountains Of Rome excerpt on his CD, you'd hear significantly more edge than in other, more mellow selections. It always sounds "great", definitely, but it's a different sound.
Anyway, part of what I think about achieving volume --
You can't do it without practicing it. You can't learn to sprint by walking, you can't learn calculus by reading a multiplication table, and you can't learn how to play loud by playing mezzo all the time. It takes time, fearlessness, intelligence (so your lips don't die), and privacy (even better for fearlessness... lol).
It also requires the player to learn the point at which the sound loses control & center. That way, he/she knows how to get to that fine line between Grand and Ugly, and not cross over.
- jbaylies
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:35 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
- Roger Lewis
- pro musician

- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:48 am
Here I go again.....
getting back to the original topic. Having, again, seen this on soooo many occasions, I would have to first ask - "which lip is doing the work?"
This has been a great discussion on embouchure efficiency. I have really enjoyed the learning experience. Another way to look at the embouchure function is as energy (the air), turned into work (the buzz). Neither the embouchure nor the air by itself produces the sound. It is a symbiotic relationship between the two that creates the sound (forget the horn - it's just an amplifier). This symbiotic relationship, though, is not equal. I have found that about 60% of the buzz sound on the mouthpiece and 40% of the air sound (the whistle you get through the stem of the mouthpiece when you just blow air through it) gives about the best sound with pretty good efficiency. Too much of either and the sound either gets too "grainyâ€
This has been a great discussion on embouchure efficiency. I have really enjoyed the learning experience. Another way to look at the embouchure function is as energy (the air), turned into work (the buzz). Neither the embouchure nor the air by itself produces the sound. It is a symbiotic relationship between the two that creates the sound (forget the horn - it's just an amplifier). This symbiotic relationship, though, is not equal. I have found that about 60% of the buzz sound on the mouthpiece and 40% of the air sound (the whistle you get through the stem of the mouthpiece when you just blow air through it) gives about the best sound with pretty good efficiency. Too much of either and the sound either gets too "grainyâ€
"The music business is a cruel and shallow trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." Hunter S Thompson
- windshieldbug
- Once got the "hand" as a cue

- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: 8vb
- Art Hovey
- pro musician

- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 12:28 am
- Location: Connecticut
- tubaguy9
- 4 valves

- Posts: 943
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:07 pm
- Location: I pitty da foo!
- Contact:
Re: Playing loud
Also, try that edge consistantly. No, not to actually make crap out of your sound, but rather to earn the embrosure(I spelled it wrong...I know). Try to use more bottom lip than top lip. Something that helps, is not letting the corners of the lips loosen. That's why it stars to get that edge. If that doesn't work, then it's the horn (I have experienced it...the horn overblows, and sounds bad...key is figuring out which it is...I learned that I can overblow a King BBb Contra at f, and a Yamaha BBb Contra at ff. A Dynasty GG I can't) I also found the (at least my opinion) dreaded sousaphone takes more...DaFatMack wrote:Any tips on playing loud, but with a good sound? The louder I get, the more edge the sound gets.
Thanks
I think I might end up as a grumpy old man when I get old...
-
Tubaguy56
- bugler

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:09 am
well, speaking of horns and volumes, another thing to consider besides bore size is the thickness of the metal, the quality of the sound may also change depending on this and also the type of metal that is used to make the instrument. just a couple things to keep in mind.
my marching band just got a new line of souzy's that are clearly better instruments than the old line, but it seems that the old souzy's actually play louder. one of the most notable difference is the thickness of the metal. my gronitz pck also has INCREDIBLY thin metal, but I think this allows the metal to resonate more freely (a similar argument to laquer versus raw brass I think).
my marching band just got a new line of souzy's that are clearly better instruments than the old line, but it seems that the old souzy's actually play louder. one of the most notable difference is the thickness of the metal. my gronitz pck also has INCREDIBLY thin metal, but I think this allows the metal to resonate more freely (a similar argument to laquer versus raw brass I think).
Besson 983 Eb
Gronitz PCK
Miraphone 186 BBb (sold)
Gronitz PCK
Miraphone 186 BBb (sold)