I'd usually go for chickens, but that one in the middle looks kind of scared. Eggs edge out el pollos....DP wrote:
Ralph




This is worth a look. I believe that the author truly understands the importance of the tuba. An excerpt:SplatterTone wrote:Although it doesn't answer your question, everything you need to know about the tuba can be found here:
http://www.bandparenting.net/tuba.html

That would make sense. Did not the Sax series of instruments originally stop at Eb as the lowest pitch with BBb only being added later. If BBb was already in use, then surely Sax would have included from the start?Rick Denney wrote:But my guess would be C. The Wieprecht system was in F and C, and the Cerveny rotary tuba was derived from the Wieprecht concept. It's likely that Cerveny was building among the first of the contrabass tubas.

ha ha ha ha...Orchestra tuba players, with a generosity which reflects the nobility of their instruments, force their horns to produce notes significantly out of tune with the tuba's perfect natural intonation in order to mask the strings' imperfections."
I believe that the F was the lowest instrument in the Wieprecht system and the Eb was the lowest in the Sax system for some time, and I agree that Sax would have never let Wieprecht have a lower instrument in his "system".Neptune wrote:That would make sense. Did not the Sax series of instruments originally stop at Eb as the lowest pitch with BBb only being added later. If BBb was already in use, then surely Sax would have included from the start?
The question which occurs to me is - Why in that case did Germanic/Czech countries adopt BBb, rather than not stay with CC?

First, the front action was also know at the time as "American action". It happened c. the 1880's as piston-valved horns replaced the American string-action horns. Top Action Rotary Valves became top-action pistons, while the Side Action Rotary Valves became front-action.Bob1062 wrote:I have no idea when it might have first happened overseas (which is where it must have REALLY first happened), but I believe my little Conn stencil Eb (3 front pistons) is from the beginning of the 1900'2 or just before (I have seen pictures of similar horns that have been dated to then).
Most of the really old Eb's that I have seen have been top action. Was Conn the first?


"The one that got away" for me was an 1889 Conn Worchester BBb with front action valves (3) that sold here eight or nine months ago. It was a neat little horn in fair shape for its age and went for $500.Bob1062 wrote:I have no idea when it might have first happened overseas (which is where it must have REALLY first happened), but I believe my little Conn stencil Eb (3 front pistons) is from the beginning of the 1900'2 or just before (I have seen pictures of similar horns that have been dated to then).Rick Denney wrote: One of my curiosities is who first made the front-action piston tuba, and who first used it. All the 19th-century American orchestras seem to be pictured with an Eb, top-action piston tuba if they have a tuba at all.
Most of the really old Eb's that I have seen have been top action. Was Conn the first?