The following based on distant observation from a strong business perspective:tubamom wrote:Thru a series of events too complex to describe at this moment, I will have an opportunity to interview for the position of Executive Director of a small regional symphony. I have a business background and know enough about classical music to be dangerous, and have great leadership skills. What I'm asking you all is for is a reality check - what does it take to be a really good executive director? What questions should I ask during the interview? Any other advice is much appreciated.
Tubamom
One thing it does NOT take is expertise on classical music, unless you have a hankering to manage the musical side of things. Best to leave that to the professionals, I would expect. The Board will let their opinions be known clearly enough, and I would probably try to avoid being between the Board and the Music Director if at all possible.
The Board sets musical direction and funding goals (usually with board members anteing up their share), and usually selects the Music Director and the Executive Director. The Music Director makes programming decisions, and seems to often be an equal to the Executive Director, at least in effect. The union contract usually stipulates the rules regarding the management of musician personnel, with little if any discretion on the part of the executive director. The executive director, therefore, is in charge of support staff personnel, payroll, accounting and books, tax records, fund-raising management, and facilities. Pretty much like any non-profit business. If you are good at motivating people to do their part, and you have an idea what their part is, you'll probably do fine.
Make sure they don't put you in the position of being responsible for things over which you have no authority. That seems to be more common than usual with non-profits.
Rick "who was once on an amateur orchestra board" Denney