Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
-
Ace
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: Berkeley, CA
Re: Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
I called Jim Laabs Music last week re the new Schiller five valve CC tuba. Who ever answered the phone said it's a killer horn, well-built, and priced at $1850 with case. I wish someone who lives in that area would go in, try it, and report back. I'd buy it in a heartbeat if it's a fairly decent horn.
-
LoTone
- bugler

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
This is a great suggestion Ace. I have placed an order for an Euphonium just before Xmas from Jim Laabs and I am having a somewhat disappointing customer service experience. Having someone go try the instrument in person is a great idea. Taking Jim Laabs salespeople advice on faith is precarious.
I will never buy online from Jim Laabs ever again.
I will never buy online from Jim Laabs ever again.
Weril J681 CC
- bisontuba
- 6 valves

- Posts: 4320
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:55 am
- Location: Bottom of Lake Erie
Re: Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
HI-
The so-called 'Schillbrunner' is the Schiller 4 rotor valve BBb tuba that is a copy of the Hirsbrunner HB BBb (I have not played a BBb Schiller tuba)--the 'Schilleraphone' -or what have you- is the CC 5 valve rotor horn that is a copy of the 186. In lacquer, the 186 copy IS a great horn-period. I own one & have used it quite a bit the last 2 months and it plays great. They had a 186 copy on ebay for Buy It Now for $1885.
I know of a few folks waiting for their Schiller Comp. Euphoniums that are back ordered--the word has gotten out (I own one of these too & it is fantastic) and they are waiting for the latest batch from China. When I have talked to Laabs Music, I usually ask for Jeff or Todd (Tel.# 800-657-5125)--either one has been able to answer my questions ASAP. Good luck!
Regards-
mark
jonestuba@juno.com" target="_blank
The so-called 'Schillbrunner' is the Schiller 4 rotor valve BBb tuba that is a copy of the Hirsbrunner HB BBb (I have not played a BBb Schiller tuba)--the 'Schilleraphone' -or what have you- is the CC 5 valve rotor horn that is a copy of the 186. In lacquer, the 186 copy IS a great horn-period. I own one & have used it quite a bit the last 2 months and it plays great. They had a 186 copy on ebay for Buy It Now for $1885.
I know of a few folks waiting for their Schiller Comp. Euphoniums that are back ordered--the word has gotten out (I own one of these too & it is fantastic) and they are waiting for the latest batch from China. When I have talked to Laabs Music, I usually ask for Jeff or Todd (Tel.# 800-657-5125)--either one has been able to answer my questions ASAP. Good luck!
Regards-
mark
jonestuba@juno.com" target="_blank
Last edited by bisontuba on Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jmerring
- 3 valves

- Posts: 374
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
Having owned, played and had stolen, the BBb 4 V Schillbrunner, my opinion is that it is built like a tank and weighs like one, too. It has the sound and vibrations (bear in mind, I'm deaf) of, what I would consider a 5/4 horn. The opinion as to sound is very obvious to my ensemble-mates. I was always too 'present' in brass sections; overpowering the EEb Getzen MW, next to me. Mind you; that was at pianissimo - fortissimo shook the room!
I had a great difficulty in filling the larger bore (from the prior BBb 186 Mira, that I owned). The bore is .787 and that little .15 difference was glaringly obvious. The horn was not played for a great length of time, before it was stolen, but I think I could have overcome the problem. I found the horn to play better at A=443. The horn was not in tune with itself, presenting myriad problems with 'on the fly' tuning (yes, I could feel the tuning and see it very clearly on the tuner sitting on my stand).
I hope someone finds this post interesting. I bore even myself.
I had a great difficulty in filling the larger bore (from the prior BBb 186 Mira, that I owned). The bore is .787 and that little .15 difference was glaringly obvious. The horn was not played for a great length of time, before it was stolen, but I think I could have overcome the problem. I found the horn to play better at A=443. The horn was not in tune with itself, presenting myriad problems with 'on the fly' tuning (yes, I could feel the tuning and see it very clearly on the tuner sitting on my stand).
I hope someone finds this post interesting. I bore even myself.
- TUBAD83
- 3 valves

- Posts: 487
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:34 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Schillbrunner vs Jethro "da tull" Sandwich
I own a Schillbruner too and jm is right: a BIG horn with a big sound and I also consider it a 5/4 horn (especially when the sucker weighs over 24lbs!). I use it in all 3 of my ensembles and have received quite a few compliments about it---definitely a winner and a keeper. Any intonation problems will clear up once you take time getting used to playing a large bore horn. VERY happy with my Schillbrunner!jmerring wrote:Having owned, played and had stolen, the BBb 4 V Schillbrunner, my opinion is that it is built like a tank and weighs like one, too. It has the sound and vibrations (bear in mind, I'm deaf) of, what I would consider a 5/4 horn. The opinion as to sound is very obvious to my ensemble-mates. I was always too 'present' in brass sections; overpowering the EEb Getzen MW, next to me. Mind you; that was at pianissimo - fortissimo shook the room!
Jerry Johnson
Wessex Kaiser BBb aka "Willie"
Wessex Luzern BBb aka "Otto"
Lone Star Symphonic Band
The Prevailing Winds
Wessex Kaiser BBb aka "Willie"
Wessex Luzern BBb aka "Otto"
Lone Star Symphonic Band
The Prevailing Winds