Anyone have any Gmeinhardt CC reviews or info

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Alex C
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:34 am
Location: Cybertexas

Re: Anyone have any Gmeinhardt CC reviews or info

Post by Alex C »

I haven't touched it but Don Harry played and commented on it. You can read what he said here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1095046074 ... struments#

I'm looking forward to playing it early next year.
City Intonation Inspector - Dallas Texas
"Holding the Bordognian Fabric of the Universe together through better pitch, one note at a time."

Practicing results in increased atmospheric CO2 thus causing global warming.
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Anyone have any Gmeinhardt CC reviews or info

Post by Bob Kolada »

I played the Eb and F (Eb was better) but not the C at Midwest. Sorry, but I didn't see a point. :razz:
User avatar
bisontuba
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4320
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Bottom of Lake Erie

Re: Anyone have any Gmeinhardt CC reviews or info

Post by bisontuba »

Hi-
If you go to any shows in early 2012--NAMM, Army Tuba Conf, Florida, Texas, Ohio, etc. the CC should be there to try.

The F tuba is incredible.

Mark
User avatar
bububassboner
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Sembach, Germany

Re: Anyone have any Gmeinhardt CC reviews or info

Post by bububassboner »

Played both the CC and the F tuba quite a bit during the convention. Here is my take.

CC: Would make a good brass quintet horn. All of these horns felt very lively and responded very fast. I personally found the low end to be stuffy. Pretty much anything using 4 and 5 was hard to blow. Does not have the power down low due to this. Yet if you use this mainly for Brass5 than that shouldn't be a huge problem. Personally, I think they need to do a redesign of the 5th valve linkage. Strange clockwork spring thing going on that needs a rubber band to move fast. Valves and slides were okay.

F: I liked this horn better. Very easy up high with a big sound. Had the same low range stuffiness as the CC but an F in my opinion, doesn't need "power" down there. If you need that use a CC. Same weird 5th valve linkage. Sounded great under the bell but my very fine Horn playing girlfriend really didn't like the sound at all. Said it has nothing special to the sound. She liked how I sounded on it better than the PT F tubas, but liked every other F tuba better than it sound wise.

I think for a cheap horn they are pretty good. I wonder if the dependent thing could be done better. Maybe making the 4th and 5th valves as "open wrap" as possible. I didn't miss the 235 combo on the F but really missed it on the CC.
Big tubas
Little tubas
Army Strong
Go Ducks!
Post Reply