I have purchased my euphonium ,but I have one more question

JayW · Post by **JayW** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:12 pm

well the first mpc that comes to mind is a Schilke 51D , but perhaps you should talk to your private teacher and see what he/she reccomends?

dmmorris · Post by **dmmorris** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:12 pm

My son is liking a Schilke 51D with his YEP642S.

I can make it squawk ok also.......

Captain Sousie · Post by **Captain Sousie** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:23 pm

Ditto the 51D

TubaRay · Post by **TubaRay** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:18 pm

Ditto to all the above.

euphoniumist · Post by **euphoniumist** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:25 pm

SM 4!

Rick Denney · Post by **Rick Denney** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:23 pm

EuphoniumDude wrote:well i had to call quickly to talk to CIC music before they closed, and they were out of Schilke 51D's, but said that they had a Yamaha 51D, which they said is the same thing, so i chose it. Is there any difference? I played on a small shank version schilke 51D, and I liked it, so if they are the same i will really like it.

It'll be close enough to get you started. When you have three months experience with that mouthpiece, you can start thinking about something else.

Rick "who also prefers the SM4 over a 51D, but who agrees the 51D is the default euphonium mouthpiece" Denney

Rick F · Post by **Rick F** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:39 pm

Congratulations on your purchase of an excellent horn! I think you'll be very happy with the 642. I didn't know this was the horn you were considering on ebay. That's the only reason I suggested the 641 being sold here on this board.

I agree with the 51D being a good mpc on this horn. The 642 usually comes stock with the Yamaha 51 (not the 51D), so this should be close to the Schilke model. Hope you make some wonderful music.

oldbandnerd · Post by **oldbandnerd** » Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:11 am

Not trying to steal Euphoniumdudes thunder but I took a real interest in in this post ,as I just got my new Weril H980 just this past monday. I am also looking at mouthpieces for my new horn.

I have to situations to cover . I need one all purpose for the concert band and one for the super high parts that I have to play in the tuba quartet .

Any suggestions here ?

Bob Mosso · Post by **Bob Mosso** » Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:38 am

Dude/Scott,

Congrats on the new horn. I would recommend starting with a 51D since thats what you're accustomed to playing. You may want to experiment with the Denis Wick SM4 or SM3, they are both bigger than the 51D.

Once you get a chance to play the new horn I'd be very interested in your comments. Perhaps a compair and contrast to the 321 you've been playing.

Oldnerd, I didn't find any difference in the ability to play the higher notes when switching between a 6.5AL (48) and a 51D, but the tone is very different. The 6.5AL is trombone-ish compaired to the 51D. Also, I'd be very interested in your opinion of the Weril, specifically the intonation of the open partials and of the valve tubing lengths.

Enjoy your new horns,
Bob

Ryan_Beucke · Post by **Ryan_Beucke** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:16 am

Just out of curiousity, could you PM me the number of the place where you're getting the 642? (CIC?)

hydeuphonium · Post by **hydeuphonium** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:59 am

KarlMarx · Post by **KarlMarx** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:36 am

LV wrote:They also make a 2, but it's considered a tubist "cheater" mpc.

Destillerad BullenscheiÃŸe!

Steven Mead honom selbst told moi, que het SM2 esse designed Ã¡ fÃ¶rdring von "his euphonium friends in the British military bands, who never needed the extreme high ranges, but who needed the optimum in fullness, carrying power, and projection".

Carolus Demystificatus

TubeNet

I have purchased my euphonium ,but I have one more question

Re: