So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Dave Detwiler
bugler
bugler
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:20 pm
Location: Harleysville, PA

So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by Dave Detwiler »

Here's something that I found in the Sousa Band Press Books that is perhaps significant. In the April 23, 1899 edition of the New York Journal, John Philip Sousa clarified how to pronounce his last name . . .
How to pronounce Sousa.jpg
So I guess it's not really a "Sue-zuh-phone"; it's a "Sue-sar-phone"!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Played an F. E. Olds 4-valve BBb in high school (late '70s)
Led the USC Trojan Marching Band tuba section (early '80s)
Now playing an F. Schmidt (=VMI) 3301 and goofing around
on a 1927 Pan American 64K Sousaphone Grand
User avatar
bisontuba
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4320
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Bottom of Lake Erie

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by bisontuba »

Interesting....
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8582
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by iiipopes »

As opposed to "Sow-za"?
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by Donn »

Portuguese pronunciation is more like SO-zuh. Normal English pronunciation is as if it were a French name.

My guess is the R at the end is an "intrusive R", more familiar in speakers from Boston who pronounce Cuba "cuber." I gather it was much more widespread even 50 years ago. While looking this up, I discovered that Sousa would probably have pronounced the city of his birth "Warshington" (DC.) So maybe he can be excused for not knowing how to pronounce his name.
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by GC »

iiipopes wrote:As opposed to "Sow-za"?
Yow-za.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by bort »

Sounds like what people in Boston would say (they add an "R" to the end of everything).
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: So it's really a "Sue-sar-phone"?!

Post by Donn »

1929 radio speech and performance of Stars and Stripes Forever
Here's a recorded radio broadcast, where he starts by introducing himself. He has a "non-rhotic" accent, where "panda" and "pander" sound the same.

The way I hear it, he's saying "SUsuh" (not "SUzuh".) I didn't write "SUsa", because you might have taken that final A as a regular vowel, hence SUsaw or something. To him, Sousa rhymes with "juicer", so instead of "uh" it apparently made sense to him to write "ar".

The International Phonetic Alphabet had reached its basic standard form 11 years earlier, so he could have less ambiguously gone with ˈsuːsə
Post Reply