Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Willard.Tristan
lurker
lurker
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 11:16 pm

Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by Willard.Tristan »

Looking for a mouthpiece with a comfortable rim, that's not too large. Open to all suggestions.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by bort »

I actually don't remember what I used most on my 188, but I found that it was not a very picky instrument -- it worked well with just about everything, and it was more about what I wanted than what worked well with the instrument.

I used (and liked a lot) a Blokepiece Symphony, it really made the low range pop on it. I ended up not liking stainless steel, but that's just personal preference.
pjdicris
bugler
bugler
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by pjdicris »

When I got my 188, I used the Conn Helleberg 120S, which is what I was using up until then.

After that, I used the Schilke 66 that was thrown in with the horn when I bought it (used). I just liked the change. I also found my sound had more zing (the 66 is smaller than the 120S, yes?)

After that, I felt I needed something bigger, and got a Warburton Arnold Jacobs. I love that mouthpiece. It gave me even response through all registers, and really thickened up the sound without having to work so hard. Apparently there's some controversy with Warburton selling the rights to the Canadian Brass, and the mouthpiece being mis-marketed. Do some research to make sure it's the proper version.

I believe the rim inside diameter is 32.5mm.

Now for all-around playing I use a Sellmansberger Symphony Cup with the Grand Shank. Fortunately, I work part-time for Dave Houser, and got to try both bloke's line and Michael Parker's. The Symphony cup gives me something a bit bigger and rounder, but the Grand Shank gives me more resistance, which helps me achieve even MORE consistent playing throughout all registers, and ability to play in the extreme dynamics without breaking up or losing response. The stainless steel takes getting used to, because you don't need to work nearly as hard to play the instrument, but this is what we call a good problem.

When trying the combination above, I also enjoyed, from the Michael Parker line, the Chris Hall cup and Helleberg Shank (this is the standard pairing). However, for me, it was a bit too similar to the Warburton (in terms of feel), and I wanted something different.

I'd say either the Warburton above is a good starting choice, and the Sellmansberger is worth looking into, but there's a bit of mix-and-match to find what suits you best.

Miraphone has a weird in-between size shank, yes? I always go with an American shank fwiw
Miraphone 188
Wessex Berg
M.O. 33P
Sellmansberger Solo and Symphony (3 piece)
doublebuzzing
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by doublebuzzing »

pjdicris wrote:When I got my 188, I used the Conn Helleberg 120S, which is what I was using up until then.

After that, I used the Schilke 66 that was thrown in with the horn when I bought it (used). I just liked the change. I also found my sound had more zing (the 66 is smaller than the 120S, yes?)

After that, I felt I needed something bigger, and got a Warburton Arnold Jacobs. I love that mouthpiece. It gave me even response through all registers, and really thickened up the sound without having to work so hard. Apparently there's some controversy with Warburton selling the rights to the Canadian Brass, and the mouthpiece being mis-marketed. Do some research to make sure it's the proper version.

I believe the rim inside diameter is 32.5mm.

Now for all-around playing I use a Sellmansberger Symphony Cup with the Grand Shank. Fortunately, I work part-time for Dave Houser, and got to try both bloke's line and Michael Parker's. The Symphony cup gives me something a bit bigger and rounder, but the Grand Shank gives me more resistance, which helps me achieve even MORE consistent playing throughout all registers, and ability to play in the extreme dynamics without breaking up or losing response. The stainless steel takes getting used to, because you don't need to work nearly as hard to play the instrument, but this is what we call a good problem.

When trying the combination above, I also enjoyed, from the Michael Parker line, the Chris Hall cup and Helleberg Shank (this is the standard pairing). However, for me, it was a bit too similar to the Warburton (in terms of feel), and I wanted something different.

I'd say either the Warburton above is a good starting choice, and the Sellmansberger is worth looking into, but there's a bit of mix-and-match to find what suits you best.

Miraphone has a weird in-between size shank, yes? I always go with an American shank fwiw
The Warburton and Canadian Brass Arnold Jacobs mouthpieces are the same thing. I think Kelly makes them now for the CB.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by bort »

I never bothered to look at the Houser website before, I never knew there were non-Blokepiece and non-Loud models!
tclements
TubeNet Sponsor
TubeNet Sponsor
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:49 am
Location: Campbell, CA
Contact:

Re: Mouthpiece Reccomendations for a Miraphone 188

Post by tclements »

That instrument was designed with a Mirafone C3. If you are not happy with that sound, try a Helleberg style mpce.
Post Reply