Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

The bulk of the musical talk
bigbob
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 592
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:09 pm
Location: shermansDale Pa

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bigbob »

TubaMusikMann wrote:RAW BRASS ANY DAY! 8)
I AGREE!! BB
eupher61
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2790
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by eupher61 »

I dunno. .. The jelly in my navel could probably eat plutonium....

Um...

The only reason I don't like raw brass is my dermal reaction to the metal. It ain't easy being green. But, I've never stripped a horn either. I ve had some touch up lacquer put on but I truly don't care. If it's bare enough to cause a reaction, I put clear Contac paper on it.
toobagrowl
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by toobagrowl »

Like others have said -- ugly lacquer can be touched up. Raw brass makes my hands smell :x I do have a raw brass tuba and I'd lacquer/shallac it if I could get an even polish on it. But the patina is just too deep in some areas to make it look decent in lacquer, so I "put up" with the raw brass. Prefer lacquer though -- even "ugly" lacquer.
User avatar
bigtubby
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:43 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bigtubby »

bort wrote:Ugly lacquer = comb-over
Raw brass = shaved head

Do the right thing. :)
Perfect!


Part of my raw brass brigade:
Image
American sailboats, airplanes, banjos, guitars and flutes ...
Italian motorcycles and cars ...
German cameras and tubas ...
Life is Good.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bort »

Question -- when a damaged bell is rolled out, do the marks show in the raw brass? Or are bell repair marks visible because of the lacquer damage?

I want my Rudy to be nice and shiny to match the rest of the tuba, but curious what repair marks would show if left in raw brass.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bort »

tuben wrote:
bort wrote:Question -- when a damaged bell is rolled out, do the marks show in the raw brass? Or are bell repair marks visible because of the lacquer damage?
The scars are visible on my unlacquered Alex's.
I figured as much, makes sense to me. Thanks!
nycbone
bugler
bugler
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:50 pm

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by nycbone »

**********
Last edited by nycbone on Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chronolith
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by chronolith »

eupher61 wrote:It ain't easy being green.
Weird. I had an old St. Pete years ago that was raw and my wrist turned blue for playing it, rather than green. Agree about the smell also. Unique.
tofu
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: One toke over the line...

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by tofu »

:tuba:
Last edited by tofu on Wed May 07, 2014 3:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jose the tuba player
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:21 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by Jose the tuba player »

.
Last edited by Jose the tuba player on Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
WTB OLDS SOUSAPHONE WITH 20 INCH BELL
User avatar
dmmorris
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:05 am
Location: From far away as Jupiter sulfur mines, way down by the methane sea.

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by dmmorris »

I thought is was age before beauty..............

Raw brass or very ugly lacquer? .....both are nice, but original raw brass is way cooler.

Image
beta 14??..........OK!

Mid 70's B&S Tuba
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bort »

Some tubas just look better in raw brass than others. A 6-valve B&S F looks GREAT in raw brass.
User avatar
dmmorris
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:05 am
Location: From far away as Jupiter sulfur mines, way down by the methane sea.

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by dmmorris »

The horn was originally in raw brass and I have never seen the need to spray-on any kind of coating. I like my tubas old and raw. On the outside, tubas should look like they aren't even playable.

Bloke's correct...the B&S in my earlier post is a contrabass, but in BBb. The extra valve set-up is 5th=long whole step and 6th=long half step. The slides for 1st and 5th are easily accessible from the top-front and the slides for 3rd and 4th are accessible from the back. Lots of interesting combos and no excuses.
beta 14??..........OK!

Mid 70's B&S Tuba
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bort »

Revisiting this old topic... How about this question: If the bell is raw brass, then what would you do with the rest of the tuba? Keep or strip?

The bell on my Rudy will be raw brass after it is repaired. The lacquer on the rest of the horn is "okay" (mild flaking when I gave the horn a bath), but lots of scratches and wear. Certainly not getting any better.

What do you think? Strip it all now, or for the stuff that is there anyway, keep it on there? I'm kind of split on it but not sure if half and half would look funny, so sort of leaning to all raw.

Opinions?
WC8KCY
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:24 am

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by WC8KCY »

Note the healthy glow of my '37 Martin Indiana Eefer in mostly raw brass...wouldn't this look just silly relacquered?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11224
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by bort »

The main idea is that I'd either end up with a perfect-looking bell and a tuba body that will show its age, or have a tuba that all around represents its age. (I can't afford, and don't want, a complete overhaul at this point.) It's more of a question of what is/looks better, a raw bell and a natural body, or the entire tuba as raw brass? Appearances for the sake or resale are not important at this point. Thanks!
vespa50sp
bugler
bugler
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:39 pm

Re: Raw brass or very ugly lacquer?

Post by vespa50sp »

I'm slowly polishing my old La See down to raw brass...
Post Reply