Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Tubaja
bugler
bugler
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:31 pm

Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by Tubaja »

I recently discovered that the receiver on my Meinl Weston F tuba is slightly bigger that the typical euro shank. All my euro shank m'pieces descend 5mm deeper into the receiver before stopping. I purchased this particular tuba from Tommy Johnson in 1993 after he had owned it for a couple of years. He said it was a prototype (for what I think became the rotary version of the 45slp.) It also seems to me that I read on these forums that in those days Warren Deck was working with Meinl Weston on developing an F tuba. Does anybody have any input as to why a bigger receiver ended up on this (or these) tubas?
User avatar
Matt Walters
The Tuba Whisperer
The Tuba Whisperer
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:20 am
Location: Woodbridge, NJ

Re: Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by Matt Walters »

Could it be that the Meinl Weston receiver is just longer than you are used to seeing? It is the inside gap of the end of the mouthpiece and the beginning of the leadpipe proper that is most important. If your current mouthpieces seat well and you like the way they play on that tuba, then don't give it another thought.
However, it is very possible that they used a larger receiver on that horn. Again, do you like the way it plays?
Matt Walters
Last chair tubist
Who Cares What Ensemble
Owns old tubas that play better than what you have.
Tubaja
bugler
bugler
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:31 pm

Re: Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by Tubaja »

Oh yeah, I am happy with how it plays. Just curious as to what the theory behind their decision was.
Tubaja
bugler
bugler
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:31 pm

Re: Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by Tubaja »

bloke wrote:I hope you understand Matt's inference...

...that the interior bore geometry may possibly (??) be the same as any other, and that the large-end of the receiver may possibly (??) just extend farther and cover more of the shank of the mouthpiece.
Yes. That is the conclusion I came to after reading Matt's response. That was a good point. Thank you.
User avatar
largobone
bugler
bugler
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:47 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by largobone »

The King 2341 receiver is just like that. I originally thought the same as you, before I realized they just added a bunch of mass to the outside, assumably for the same reason people buying megatone mouthpieces and whatnot.
MM DePaul University
bass trombone, Evanston Symphony
trombone, Ohio Light Opera
Tubaja
bugler
bugler
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:31 pm

Re: Question about Meinl Weston F tuba Receiver

Post by Tubaja »

largobone wrote:The King 2341 receiver is just like that. I originally thought the same as you, before I realized they just added a bunch of mass to the outside, assumably for the same reason people buying megatone mouthpieces and whatnot.
Yep. Thanks Largobone!
Post Reply