low c

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

jonesbrass wrote:a) Is it not a problem for them, and americans just aren't used to F tubas (having all come from BBb or CC)?
or
b) What is their method for conquering this particular range?
a.) As several have pointed out, the F is their standard instrument, receiving the bulk of their daily practice. They probably think the contrabass feels weird on that note.

b.) I think using three words in the same sentence: "several", "hours", and "daily".

Rick "glad to see Jay posting, even if just a little" Denney
tbn.al
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Post by tbn.al »

Scooby Tuba wrote: Now, some find that playing that same stuffy low C with fingerings using MORE valves suddenly makes the C better. :idea: Added resistance! It's common for German players to be taught this from the beginning. It's part of their "fingering vocabulary".
This makes all the more sense from a bass trombone perspective. Many bass trombonists used to prefer the 6th position low F to the trigger 1st. Ostensibly this was because of the added resistance of the valve. With the new low resistance valves this becomes a mute point. What is really happening I think is that the note has a more open feel due to the increase in bore through the trigger section. By playing it in 6th they keep the bore the same all the way down. My horn is so well balanced that I do not feel any difference whether the trigger is in or out.
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
User avatar
jonesbrass
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Sanford, NC

Post by jonesbrass »

Rick Denney wrote:
jonesbrass wrote:a) Is it not a problem for them, and americans just aren't used to F tubas (having all come from BBb or CC)?
or
b) What is their method for conquering this particular range?
a.) As several have pointed out, the F is their standard instrument, receiving the bulk of their daily practice. They probably think the contrabass feels weird on that note.

b.) I think using three words in the same sentence: "several", "hours", and "daily".

Rick "glad to see Jay posting, even if just a little" Denney
Willson 3050S CC, Willson 3200S F, B&S PT-10, BMB 6/4 CC, 1922 Conn 86I
Gone but not forgotten:
Cerveny 681, Musica-Steyr F, Miraphone 188, Melton 45, Conn 2J, B&M 5520S CC, Shires Bass Trombone, Cerveny CFB-653-5IMX, St. Petersburg 202N
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

I tried out my M-W 182's low register, in particular that C and really cannot say there is a problem. It does lack some depth of tone and I would personally not choose an F to play much below the staff, but it does speak, even for someone like myself who is new to F tubas.

I tend to use my 182 specifically for higher register playing where it has a beautiful and unique singing voice
Charlie Goodman
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:38 pm
Location: Portage, MI

Post by Charlie Goodman »

Neptune wrote:I tried out my M-W 182's low register, in particular that C and really cannot say there is a problem. It does lack some depth of tone and I would personally not choose an F to play much below the staff, but it does speak, even for someone like myself who is new to F tubas.

I tend to use my 182 specifically for higher register playing where it has a beautiful and unique singing voice
Really? Never?
User avatar
Todd S. Malicoate
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Post by Todd S. Malicoate »

tubashaman wrote:Austria (German based nation)
Wow...don't ever let an Austrian hear you say that :D
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

Charlie Goodman wrote:
Neptune wrote:I tried out my M-W 182's low register, in particular that C and really cannot say there is a problem. It does lack some depth of tone and I would personally not choose an F to play much below the staff, but it does speak, even for someone like myself who is new to F tubas.

I tend to use my 182 specifically for higher register playing where it has a beautiful and unique singing voice
Really? Never?
Really, Never what? If you are referring to low register - not by choice. I would pull out my Eb which has a much fuller low register.

For me the advantage of the F is its beautiful high register tone which an Eb just cannot match.
User avatar
Todd S. Malicoate
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Post by Todd S. Malicoate »

tubashaman wrote:Well, Mozart is actually from Austria, yet is considered a German composer
By whom?

Additionally, Mozart's not the best composer to use for an example...his tuba parts are terrible. :D
jeopardymaster
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 982
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Ft Thomas, KY

Unintended consequences

Post by jeopardymaster »

eupher61 wrote:My B&S has a dent right next to the 5th rotor, on the inside of the outside tube. Viewed from above, it's about 2 o'clock on the tube. Bob Tucci speculated that it may be in just the right place to smooth out a nodal point or two.

When that happened, the low range opened up instantly.
Hey, eupher - please post some pictures. Maybe someone would like to duplicate your happy dent on their F. Really - no snark intended. It might be worth some study!
eupher61
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2790
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm

Post by eupher61 »

I'm trying to get a good picture. The main problem right now is getting a cable to get the picture onto the PC... :oops: :roll:
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

Sorry -- hangover from a prior life: the phrase is "moot point."
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

Thanks for the great info,insight,and opinions.The quickest of these ideas to pay off so far is the 125 fingering by Adam C.Immediately about 20-25% better.I plan on trying several of the other tips and exercises and will report my findings.
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

As all of you know, I´m not a professional.
But I´m German, started on BBb, changed to F later, and ended up living and playing tuba (F and CC) in Austria. Maybe that counts as appropriate background to add comments to this thread.

When I got the F (I was a 22 year-old student of mechanical engineering back then) I made the transition from BBb to F on my own. I did notice the range below Eb to be, errm, different.
Very soon,I found myself practicing that range more than anything else. I used to be the only tuba in a 45 piece youth band, so for several years I was forced to play the BBb tuba part on the small horn.
My observation:
- F tubas have an incredible flexibility pitchwise in that range. Finger a C (4), buzz an Eb, and an Eb you´ll get.
- the "true" pitch seems to be close to the low end of that array of accessible frequencies, in that range.
- try to play the notes "too low" (as in : finger a Db, pretend to buzz a B), and chances are you´ll get it right.

This worked with me as well as both my beginning students.
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

I've noticed this to be true also.This fact is making me a bit nervous regarding using my f as a quintet horn.I'm used to laying a pretty solid foundation as far as pitch with my CC.It really pretty much steers me into the slot I need to be in.The f is great for matching others but that's not always the role of tuba in quintet.I think there is a lot to be learned in mastering the rotary f on many important fronts.That's one of the reason I'm pursuing it...
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
eupher61
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2790
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm

Post by eupher61 »

This whole thing must be a factor of the German rotary design. Front piston (ok, side) Fs don't seem to have this problem, and certainly the Besson 3+1 doesn't.

As I said earlier in this thread, that little dent (picture still pending a stupid cable!) made all the difference in the world, in the C range. The other thing that helped on my B&S was getting the shank turned down a little bit, to better fit the stock receiver. This was 6-7 years after the dent opened the range, but getting the mpc in another 1/4" made a huge difference in the whole horn, made everything feel even more secure, top to bottom.

I use 125, 35, and 4 interchangeably, depending on how lazy I am. There may be the slightest difference in pitch, but none in response.
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

regarding CC-tubas in Austria:

CC and Eb tubas are a No-No around here. When you go to the conservatory, definitely so.
I just happen to be a reckless part of the UNDERGROUND, not giving a **** and publically stating so.
A buddy of mine is playing Eb in the Montafon valley. I sure hope both of us aren´t going to end up in BBb-camps because of this post. I´ve said too much already. AAAArrrGH!!
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

tubashaman wrote:So Austria allows CC tubas? Besides America and England, where are they used.
The barriers are disappearing. I was surprised to see a York style 6/4 CC being played in the Munich Philharmonic last year :shock: :)
samulirask
bugler
bugler
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:30 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Low C and PT10

Post by samulirask »

Right now I´m trying out two different tubas, Yamahas 822 and B&S:s 3099 (PT10). I already knew that Yamaha has a great "lowC"-register, but I was really surprised that PT10 works also very well down there. No matter how I try to blow them, high, low, soft or loud, the usual problem notes (B-C-Db-D) are very well on place.

Has B&S done some improvements on this instrument, or is it just this particular tuba? Or have I learned to play the notes better..?
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: Low C and PT10

Post by Wyvern »

samulirask wrote:Has B&S done some improvements on this instrument, or is it just this particular tuba? Or have I learned to play the notes better..?
Talking to Bob Tucci last year, I got the impression they are continually tweaking to improve the Perentucci models.
Post Reply