
Peace and long life.
"Art form" is in the eye of the beholder. I know we can all agree that what these dedicated, talented, and very hard-working young people do is very impressive.




BierGeek wrote:Seriously, what happened to friendly?GJDavis1 wrote:Does Tiger Woods play a brass instrument while swinging his club? Thats the difference...we're actually PLAYING MUSIC.mceuph wrote:Just because something is performed at a high level, that does not make it an art. Tiger Woods' golf swing is artistic and beautiful, does that make it an art?
You make a post. You read opinions different from your own. You start defending drum corps as if it needs defending. You DID drop lines that made you come off as an elitist yourself. You talk about others being overzealous about drum corps. What do you think YOU are doing right now? Who gives a cr@p if people don't take it as seriously as you do?
The bottom line is that you're taking it WAY too seriously. It is entertainment. You all pay to take marching to some of the highest levels possible. It will NOT be taken as seriously as a symphony concert. It would probably be taken more seriously than a community band concert. In the end, they're all forms of entertainment because we are there to present a great product for an audience.

IIRC (and this is very rusty), he marched "Magic of Orlando" in the late 1980s. He might have marched a higher level corps, I just can't remember what.GJDavis1 wrote:I also believe Mike Roylance marched more than just FutureCorps.
Be careful. I understand that music is your main passion. However, there are groups that cater to the highest level of all performing arts:I don't quite get how drum corps is the same as sending a kid off to theater camp...the level of excellence is quite a bit higher than a high school band or theater program. So I was kind of insulted in that regard, but you do have your own opinion. I mean, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra DOES have a much higher level of excellence than drum corps does, so maybe I see part of your reasoning.


I think that a lot of the residual anti-drum corps sentiment dates from the days before corps 'became' a musical activity.[/quote]Mike-ICR wrote:

Although I actually agree with the point of your statement, for the sake of humor I will raise this point. If football scoring is not based on opinions, what's the deal with the NCAA National Championship in football?GJDavis1 wrote: Drum corps is completely different from football for one huge reason : scores are not based off of performance alone. In football, scores are determined completely by the team's performance. In drum corps, or competitive music in general, scores are based off of OPINIONS. If football scoring was based off of opinions, I could see your reasoning.






I didn't mean to accuse you of being a fanatic. Also, my personal jury is still out on wether or not I like drum corps. I just really don't like talking about it for hours, and you are clearly NOT the individual who gave me that feeling.Yes, there are corps fantatics. If I was a corps fanatic, I would be telling you that orchestra and band don't compare to drum corps or some other random garbage that isn't true. Why do you think I even posted on here? Simply to find out the majority opinion of the question I asked.

That pretty much sums up my view on drum corps. Yes, it is art (particularly most DCI World Class corps), but not on the same level as professional classical ensembles. Is performing 1812 with a drum corps the same as with an orchestra? Absolutely not. That said, there is a level of artistry involved with the activity. Although I never decided to march, I have great respect for the activity and those who choose to participate in it.GJDavis1 wrote:...drum corps is NOT as artistic as orchestra or band...of course you can't be as spur of the moment and expressive as you can in those ensembles, but to say the groups don't have artistic qualities or aren't playing real music is absurd.