I'm not going to try to attach labels to these examples, but when I was in high school, I wore out the two tuba solo recordings (vinyl, btw) I had. One was Roger Bobo and the other was Harvey Phillips.bloke wrote:"an imaginary sound" vs. "an imaginary sound"
bloke "I would like to hear someone - someone who believes these are actually 'schools' which are 'definable' - demonstrate these two different supposed types of sounds. My guess would be that they would (depending on which supposed type of sound they believe that they 'like') demonstrate one way with a 'nice' sound and the other with an 'ugly' sound - again, depending on which one they had decided that they like."
I learned a ton from listening to both (and fortunately had a great private teacher who left pencil bruises on my arm if I tried to just "copy" them without understanding what I was doing). There is no question the two of them had very different sound concepts for solo playing. I don't think the differences in that case are imaginary.
Sure, for the most part, posts on this board quibble over differences that are mostly imaginary. But some real differences exist.





