Leto Cruise wrote:THOR
Very bright sound, easy to get edgy and lose refinement.
I disagree completely. The performance of any vehicle is greatly affected by the driver, I suppose. But I find this statement to be completely contrary to my experience with my Thor. Then again, my Thor is thertainly thuperior.
Leto Cruise wrote:
The Thor is a very good instrument as are the others. Despite this, the tendency is for players to abuse the instrument and over blow, play like Jason Voorhees in the low register, rattle the walls down, and it offers a sound without many overtones that tire the ears eventually. This is not to say that a capable and honorable gentleman is to be incapacitated to perform with taste and refinement.
I also disagree with the statement that it offers a sound without overtones. In fact, I think it's quite superior in this regard, allowing for an ability to blend with other instruments in a manner exceeding a number of other 5/4 horns I've tried. I think it's actually quite consistent, thereby seeming possibly bland. I remember trying a PT6P years ago that I thought was horrible because every valve combination produced a different formula of overtones. Playing a one-octave scale sounded out of tune to my ear at first, then I realized it was much more the case that each scale degree had a different color to it because it was a different balance of overtones from one note to the next. I don't know which would be preferable to the world-at-large, but I find the consistency of the Thor more suitable to my tastes. I think this trait is also the reason I find the horn responds differently to each mouthpiece. I've only ever had one other horn that exceeded the Thor in its ability to reflect a change in a mouthpiece. 5 mouthpieces=5 Thors.