Where does “The York” rank?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by cjk »

So are the valves on the Yorks made out of sousaphone parts? :D
peterbas
bugler
bugler
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:54 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by peterbas »

Deleted
Last edited by peterbas on Fri Mar 17, 2023 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Matt G
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:24 am
Location: Quahog, RI

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by Matt G »

bloke wrote:Though the audio compression is severe, there's a recording (extraordinary playing - just as one would expect) of Tchaik 4 on youtube...Chicago Symphony/Barenboim...
It wasn't immediately after Mr. Gene was hired, but decades ago.
I have never viewed either Mr. Gene nor Mr. Jake as "careless"...not at all...but some pretty good dents - in the York tuba - are easily seen in that picture...
...much like the dents that some have ended up with in their very thin-walled Gronitz PCK tubas (sure: and other thin-walled tubas, such as many Czech, etc.)
Those horns are often being handled as freight and simply being carted around as such. I’m pretty sure the players were more than careful.
Dillon/Walters CC
Meinl Weston 2165
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by Rick Denney »

I think as interesting as the instrument comparison is player comparisons. Any given tuba player might prefer one of the two CSO Yorks over the other, for reasons unrelated to Mr. Jacobs's preferences (or to Gene's), so it stands to reason that any given player might prefer one of the copies over the originals.

The question is which instruments are true to the concept espoused by Mr. Jacobs, that of being a highly efficient "old man's tuba", and of being the "Stradivarius of tubas". For the latter, I expect he particularly valued the musical potential of the instrument--dynamic control perhaps being a key element of that. On the efficiency topic, I've played a variety of them over the years, and some take what you have and magnify it, and others demand more of you. The more recent crop tend to be the former. The original "copy"--the Holton 345--could go either way in that dimension. Mine is efficient, but I've played them that are not. I suspect it has to do with residual stresses from assembly and from shaping the branches.

So, I expect Mr. Jacobs would be impressed with the variety of good choice we have today in that type of instrument, and he might even consider some new ones of his own simply to have more options that fit his concept for situations where he wouldn't want to risk the York.

Rick "recognizing that Jacobs had no instrument to compare it to, until long after he had fully mastered the one he owned" Denney
User avatar
Matt G
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:24 am
Location: Quahog, RI

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by Matt G »

bloke, agreed, I was simply pointing out for those playing at home that horns like those Yorks are getting handled by more than just the players.

I also agree, to an extent, with Rick in that you can sit five York clones in a room with five different players and each one will like a different horn. Unique individuals are unique and all that.

Basically, I guess the true benchmark would be having Mr. Jacobs available to blow through myriad examples of myriad clones and see where things stack up. Mr. Pokorny would likewise suffice as he’s had 30 years of experience with the original as well.

It’s an interesting proposition (to me at least) that there may be a horn “better” than the original out there based on how many have been made.
Dillon/Walters CC
Meinl Weston 2165
User avatar
Matt G
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1196
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:24 am
Location: Quahog, RI

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by Matt G »

lost wrote:
Matt G wrote:bloke, agreed, I was simply pointing out for those playing at home that horns like those Yorks are getting handled by more than just the players.

I also agree, to an extent, with Rick in that you can sit five York clones in a room with five different players and each one will like a different horn. Unique individuals are unique and all that.

Basically, I guess the true benchmark would be having Mr. Jacobs available to blow through myriad examples of myriad clones and see where things stack up. Mr. Pokorny would likewise suffice as he’s had 30 years of experience with the original as well.

It’s an interesting proposition (to me at least) that there may be a horn “better” than the original out there based on how many have been made.
Randomly thought from this post. I watched a sound research study on Stradivarius violins paired against the best violins made today, and blind listeners seemed to pick the newer models. That doesn't make the Stradivarius violins any less valuable. An original is an original, even if it tales on mythical proportions. :tuba:
I agree. Stradivarius violins set the stage for modern violin design and craftsmanship. Add to that they are now centuries old. They absolutely have value for those reasons. Similarly, the Yorks should have a similar value scaled to interest.

But that study reinforces the notion that modern manufacturing and design can turn out a better playing tuba than the prototype. And that’s okay.
Dillon/Walters CC
Meinl Weston 2165
tofu
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: One toke over the line...

Re: Where does “The York” rank?

Post by tofu »

.
Last edited by tofu on Wed Dec 29, 2021 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply