Why don't more people use the main tuning slide?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Ed Jones wrote:The answer to the question is simple:

If manufacturers made tubas with the main slides adjustable on the fly, they would be admitting that their instruments played out of tune.
I suspect you're right, Ed, but it makes no sense. It seems to me that there are enough variations in tuning systems, tuning in various keys, and in playing conditions so that the notion that intonation is automatic should be rejected out of hand.

Another possibility is that then the manufacturers would have to provide a tuning slide that is actually long enough to do some good.

Rick "who has built or used main-slide tuning sticks on three tubas" Denney
User avatar
druby
bugler
bugler
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:11 pm

Think about the mechanics....

Post by druby »

Being a current and past owner of a Connstellation Euph and having played the Besson Prestige, I can tell you that the mechanics of the spring loaded adjustable tuning slide are somewhat precarious on the relatively small slides in Euphs.

The Conn's usually dribble condensation and you have to cradle the whole horn with your left hand and reach around to move the slide. However at least the slide is on the front where there is nothing to interfere. On the Besson's. the slide is on the back of the horn, so thre are shirt protector shields to keep grease and drool off of your shirt. These horns have had issues with sticky linkage. On both horns, you have to keep the slide very clean and lubricated with a very light grease (like vaseline) to insure a good seal and smooth movement. Also, it is hard to completely drain the main tuning slide just with the spit valve, but the mechanism keeps the slide from being easily removeabl. The newest Bessons have a quick release ball linkage to help out with this issue.

My concern on a Tuba is that you have to move a much larger slide a longer distance to get the same effect. It has to have a very quick release and return (ergo strong spring mechansim) and the fit, finish and alignmnt on the slide has to b perfect for this to all work. Sounds like an accident waiting to happen to me (given that Tubas are more dent/ding prone than most other brass instruments).

Doug
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Rick Denney wrote:there are enough variations in tuning systems, tuning in various keys, and in playing conditions so that the notion that intonation is automatic should be rejected out of hand
Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Think about the mechanics....

Post by Rick Denney »

druby wrote:My concern on a Tuba is that you have to move a much larger slide a longer distance to get the same effect. It has to have a very quick release and return (ergo strong spring mechansim) and the fit, finish and alignmnt on the slide has to b perfect for this to all work. Sounds like an accident waiting to happen to me (given that Tubas are more dent/ding prone than most other brass instruments).
These issues have been worked out one at a time in many cases.

I built a spring-loaded tuning stick for my Sanders Bb tuba (a Cerveny). It had a bell crank to operate the sideways slide using a T-handle at the top. It flattened the instrument when you pushed it down, and then returned to a normal set position. That slide was surely not perfect, but it worked. It was inspired by a (better made) mechanism of similar design on a 188 owned by Jay Rozen.

On a Vespro, the fifth partial was unusably flat. I built a tuning stick for the sideways main slide that sharpened the instrument when pushed down. I mounted it alongside the first valve slide and put a thumb ring on it so that I could sharpen the main slide using the left hand while it was resting on the first valve slide. My tech and I adjusted the main slide to work appropriately fast. It still wasn't perfect by Blokian standards but it worked.

My plastic Martin tuba has a tuning stick which is just attached to the side of the downward-pointing main slide. That tuning stick was installed by or at the request of Lenny Jung, its previous owner. I suspect its main purpose was to overcome the valve swindle since the instrument has only three valves.

Speaking of valve swindle, Don Stauffer, who first coined that term, recalls receiving a conductor complaint concerning the tuning of the third partial on his Conn BAT back in the day. He describes installing a curtain rod as a tuning stick on that instrument, in the 1940's, and how its success led to similar devices on his later tubas. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if he and Lenny Jung had compared notes on the subject.

The Martin and Vespro were not spring loaded, and on reflection I see no need for spring loading. We manipulate the first valve slide all the time with no spring-loaded resting place.

All of these mechanisms were suffiently inboard to prevent damage from minor accidents, and provide at least two inches of slide movement. The ones I build (and the one of the Martin) were pretty primitive mechanically. In the ones that I built, I didn't do any soldering at all, but attached the mechanisms to the instruments using nylon wire ties.

Rick "thinking it would be easy for the manufacturers to provide main-slide tuners" Denney
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Don't expect your horn to redesign itself, use your

Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
tbn.al
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Post by tbn.al »

I have a Marzan Euph with the main tuning slide pointing up with a thumb ring to facilitate tuning any note. That is the problem. You can tune any note. I have enough trouble remembering which slide to pull how much on my Miraphone for the marginaly out of tune notes. The issue is much more complicated when you are using just one slide to tune everything. If you are not careful you can get totally out of whack. I've caught myself pulling while also lipping up. It's really very confusing. For instance the first valve Eb at the bottom of the treble clef is quite sharp on this horn. I find it much less confusing to use 13 alternate which is spot on than trying to pull. I find myself using the main slide just as I would the first valve slide on the tuba. If a sustained note is really bad I might pull or push. Otherwise alternate fingerings work better for me.
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
User avatar
OldsRecording
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:26 pm
Location: Agawam, Mass.

Post by OldsRecording »

Bob1062 wrote: But the bigger question is, why don't MORE instruments have them? OR why don't more players use rods/triggers/... to acheive the same goal?
My trumpet has a spring-loaded trigger on the third valve slide and it always seemed much easier to use than a ring or one of those oarlock-shaped thingies, and I never understood why more horns don't have them.
bardus est ut bardus probo,
Bill Souder

All mushrooms are edible, some are edible only once.
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Chuck Jackson »

"And, the Yamaha 641 is a direct copy of the Mirafone. Ask 'em."

I beg to disagree. The 641 is almost an exact clone of the MW 25 right down to the 4th valve slide on the front of the horn. I own a 641 and it is nothing like any Miraf(ph)one I have ever played, either ergonomically or response wise. Personally, as good as my 641 is (the BEST example I have ever played) it is not as good an instrument OVERALL as 99% of the Miraf(ph)ones I have played. The 641 has a huge bore (.820) and is a cannon-cocker until you to the 8th partial where it is as hard to play as a Kiaser Alex BBb I once owned. From BBBb to F in the staff, it is the most resonant and colorful instrument I have ever owned. The Mirafone is better to me because it is more facile past the 8th partial and has lighter valves. The sound in the cash register lags behind the 641. On the 641 the only note I ever had to pull for was the abysmally sharp G on the top space. The rest of the horn is set and play.

I have owned a Marzan, Boehm&Meinl, and 2 Alex's that had either a factory built upward pointing main slide or custom installed main slide jiggers on the Alex's. On the Alex's I had them taken off and played the chinese fingers that worked and on the Marzan and B&M I set them with rubber gromets and let them be unless I was playing low F and below and then I pulled. Ears should dictate, but the mechanical end can help facilitate the fine tuning.

Chuck
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

Hmm. In 1971, as an 8th grade tuba student, we got brand new Miraphone 186 BBbs -- wonderful horns.

Based on E's info re: the ubiquitous Miraphones, I guess I should be surprised that upon entering HS in 10th grade, we got brand new MW horns -- very nice, heavier gauge metal than the Mira's -- I assume they were 25's, but I don't remember them being quite a tall as an older, used 25 I just looked at last weekend at WWBW.
We liked them better than the Miraphones -- darker sound, but took a bit more air as I remember.

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Chuck Jackson »

bloke wrote:flame bait, but I am not trolling:

In 1977-'78, I taught the tuba students at K.U. (University of Kansas). Dr. Foster decided to buy a "new and exciting" Yamaha 641 rotary BBb. One arrived. The pitch was horrible in the upper part of the staff, and response was very tenuous at the top of the staff. I was hoping for something better for my students. The store that sold it to the school picked it up and replaced it with another... ' same problems. By then - though I hadn't yet informed anyone - I had decided that I was not going to stay, so (as they REALLY wanted one of those tubas) I simply said, "whatever".

Twenty years later, I taught the tuba students at Ole Miss (University of Mississippi). They had - just the year before - bought two or three 641 Yamaha rotary BBb tubas. They were the same wretched instruments. As all of the "old" tubas were right in the room where I taught, I had students playing on old worn bell-front King 2341 tubas to practice and play for lessons and recitals, and they (to please the band director and to avoid waves) were using those wretched/shiny Yamaha tubas in the concert band.

I really don't think they are copies of M-W 25 tubas. M-W 25 tubas CAN BE PLAYED. Further, there are quite a few other physical differences. I think the Yamaha 641 is just a tuba...and not a copy of anything in particular.
I generally agree with Joe. Besides my personal 641, the only one that was as good was Wade "Elephant" Rackley's that he had when we were students at the USAESOM. The others have been wretched instruments. But, mine is as hard to play in the upper register as an Alex Kaiser BBb. Due to it's large bore the upper register is really bad. I would never want to "live" above the 8th partial on the thing, but anything up to it I have found to be dandy. Even mine has a good low Ab, a dreaded note on the majority of these horns. The small bell flare (16 1/2") combined with it's larger bore and mostly open wrap make it one of the most present tubas I have ever played. I have listened to recordings of my playing on various CC's and the 641 and I was surprised how much sound the horn put out up to the 6th partial, after that it is a crap shoot. Thankfully I had a good bass tuba to do most of my quintet work on as well as the lighter orchestral stuff. And I will add my own flame bait: I have never played ANY Meinl Weston instrument that I liked, all the way from the 25 through the 2000's and various incarnations of the 2145, 55, and 65's. They seemed "hollow" TO ME (note capitals here ladies and gentlemen), kinda like Hirsbrunner instruments.

Chuck
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
User avatar
tubatom91
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 808
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Aurora,Illinois
Contact:

Post by tubatom91 »

The only 2 slides I move on my YBB-321 are the Main slide (only for open notes during warmup/tuning) And my 1st valve tuning slide, the Eb on the staff tends to be about 3-4in sharp(don't know how that correlates with cents but inches work good) and I only pull it if I take anything up an octave. Thank god the slide is right where I put my hand while playing. I never tend to have any other intonation problems on my horn (however much I hate it!!!).
Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia-Nu Omicron Chapter
Holton 345 BBb 4V
Miraphone 188-5U CC
Meinl-Weston 45S F
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

Ed, we don't need to call someone to know that unequivocally,the 641 doesn't resemble any miraphone model.It does pretty closely resemble the MW25.Would someone with some skill please post some pics of these 3 horns side by side...
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

MikeMason wrote:Ed, we don't need to call someone to know that unequivocally,the 641 doesn't resemble any miraphone model.It does pretty closely resemble the MW25.Would someone with some skill please post some pics of these 3 horns side by side...
<img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Mi ... 86prv4.jpg"> <img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Yamaha/yybb641.jpg"> <img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Me ... /68508.jpg">

They all look like tubas to me... :P
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

Chuck(G) wrote:
MikeMason wrote:Ed, we don't need to call someone to know that unequivocally,the 641 doesn't resemble any miraphone model.It does pretty closely resemble the MW25.Would someone with some skill please post some pics of these 3 horns side by side...
<img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Mi ... 86prv4.jpg"> <img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Yamaha/yybb641.jpg"> <img src="http://images.wwbw.com/products/full/Me ... /68508.jpg">

They all look like tubas to me... :P
Left - 186, Middle - 641, Right - MW25 (with 4th valve "up top")

The 1st and 3rd slides coming up top, side-by-side (641 in the middle) is a very distinctive MW trait -- you will see it at their web site for a number of horns -- contrabass and bass tubas alike.

As someone who has played a 186 AND MW25 extensively, and who has tooted on a 641, I would have to say that "Door #2 and Door #3" both look very similar -- even moreso if the MW25 used to have the 4th valve on the backside and not brought up top (sitting to the right of the 1st valve slide as you look at the horn).

(Insert Sesame Street song here: "One of these things is not like the others ....") I choose the 186 as the odd man out -- quite clear from the photos.

Therefore, any claim by Yamaha to be a clone of the 186 Miraphone must be "advertising" -- OR a result of very poor copying! (And we all know that "poor copying" is not a modern Japanese trait.)

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

also keep in mind the 186 at the time was the smaller 16.5 inch bell.If someone is up for it,post an old 186 BBb,641,and an older 25.I think it would be even more different.
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

(insert food post here) :wink:
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Chuck Jackson »

I guess the previous posts says it all. Ed, you are wrong. Wade and I and another of others are right. I still like Miraf(ph)ones as an all around Tuba. THe MW Bell Model(Kudos to Robert Coulter for bringing that horn to light) is the only good product to come out of the factory (I have played 3 that were very good instruments), and I still think that Hirsbrunners are THE most over-rated instrument ever made. Joe, I wouldn't embarass myself or the Thor by trying to play one, so if you say it's a keeper, it must be a good horn. Now, Fried Chicken anyone?

Chuck
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Post by MikeMason »

Chuck,one of the good qualities of the Thor is it's ease of play.I think you would probably sound just fine on one...
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
Chuck Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Chuck Jackson »

MikeMason wrote:Chuck,one of the good qualities of the Thor is it's ease of play.I think you would probably sound just fine on one...
Thanks, Mike, but with my Focal Distonia, I can't even make a slide whistle sound good. The mind is willing, but the flesh is week.

Chuck"wishing with all the new horns coming out that he still could play even a bit"Jackson
I drank WHAT?!!-Socrates
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

Chuck Jackson wrote:I guess the previous posts says it all. Ed, you are wrong. Wade and I and another of others are right. I still like Miraf(ph)ones as an all around Tuba. THe MW Bell Model(Kudos to Robert Coulter for bringing that horn to light) is the only good product to come out of the factory (I have played 3 that were very good instruments), and I still think that Hirsbrunners are THE most over-rated instrument ever made.
Yamaha Marketing Folks wrote:This horn has the traditional German sound, a tubing wrap reminiscent of the early Meinl Westons, the long leadpipe and bell of the Miraphones and the resonance of the Cervenys.
Notice that the quote tries to liken the 641 with MW, Mira, Cerveny. Was the 641 the first rotary horn Yamaha brought to the market? IF so, then one good way to try to establish it would be to claim, "It's just like all the other guys' good tubas out there -- HONEST!" :wink: But that's just good marketing. To find out what's really true, "show me the data" says Steve The Engineer.

IF WRAP641 N.E. WRAPMIRA AND TAPER641 N.E. TAPERMIRA AND VALVETUBING641 N.E. VALVETUBINGMIRA, THEN 641 N.E. MIRA.
Chuck, again wrote:Joe, I wouldn't embarass myself or the Thor by trying to play one, so if you say it's a keeper, it must be a good horn. Now, Fried Chicken anyone?

Chuck
13 still equals 13, and all is well in the TubeNet universe!

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
Post Reply