It's a good point Joe, perhaps I tend to see things through my own personal perspective as a professional orchestral player. Even the orchestra used to do at least one opera excerpts concert every year. Perhaps it's just my good fortune to not have run into any conductor that told me to leave the cimbasso at home. It's so much fun to play (hard work too) and so rewarding in the final product that I hope I never see such a conductor.
I'm not even going to speculate about the use of a cimbasso in a broadway show. Some notions are simply too horrible to contemplate.
My opinion for what it's worth...
Principal Tuba - Miami Symphony, Kravis Pops
Tuba/Euphonium Instructor - Florida International University,
Broward College, Miami Summer Music Festival
I've had the pleasure of working for the New York Grand Opera and Maestro Vincent La Selva for several years. I've played ALL of Verdi's operas during consecutive summers in Central Park under the project name: "Viva Verdi" http://www.newyorkgrandopera.org/viva.htm
Except for Macbeth, Otello and Don Carlo, they could have easily been played on cimbasso. Actually, I did play some on cimbasso when I had the opportunity to borrow one from Meinl Weston (in F)
It's true - the cimbasso does and should sound like a bass trombone on steroids. I especially liked the reaction of my stringed (strung?) colleagues when I brought this thing in. I was VERY tempted to put cross-hairs on the bell but, alas, it was only a borrowed instrument.
Lots of fun to play, the trombone players loved it - I was one of THEM - and even the conductor didn't wince too often. Sam's cimbasso looks great and I applaud the effort/talent that went into creating it.
Otello surprised me. First of all, we did these things on 3 rehearsals and couldn't get the music in advance. La Selva is VERY specific as to how he wants things played - the majority of the usual cuts in these operas were played, for example. Anyhow, Otello is, in my opinion, a CC tuba part - as is the Requiem. The others could and should be played on F.
Just as a footnote - tradition at the Met is that most of those Verdi operas are played on trombone - perhaps Chris Hall could chime in, here.
So I'm currious now. I though a cimbasso was a tuba ranged baritone/ valve trombone.
So what would you call a Bb, cylindrical bore horn in the range of a tuba?
Wether it has an upright bell (ala baritone) or a forward bell(ala trombone).
You the bell arrngment make it a different horn then?
Either way, I want cylindrical bore horn, in the tuba range, I'd prefer a trombone style bell on it..
LV wrote:
The front-facing-over-the-shoulder version is a recent development, but is essentially the same horn with a different wrap. Tuba range, very cylindrical bore, blends well with trombones.
Looks like what I want. Well, move the valves to the front first
Now to get the cash...
I've got one of these strange Italian basses (made by Orsi):
It's in Eb and has a tiny 0.495 bore and takes a tenor-shank trombone mouthpiece. For the bore size, it's surprisingly free-blowing, but takes some real technique getting a good sound down in the lower register.
I can't be sure even what the "authentic" idea of a cimbasso is (maybe a six-valve bimbonifono is also a cimbasso?), but the examples I've seen all have fairly small bores.
The Verdi BBb upright appears to be a "dual bore" instrument with a larger bore of cylindrical tubing after the valve section and before the final flare. That's what I intend to do with subsequent cimbassi that I build.
After taking stock of what it will take in parts and labor I think that I can build 4-valve cimbassi for $2850 and the 5-valves for $3450.
I'm not convinced that the 5th valve on a cimbasso is at all necessary. It seems from the opera parts that I've encountered that the 4 valve horns are quite adequate. Range on a couple of them seems to indicate that Verdi was writing with a 3-valve Bb (not BBb) instrument in mind. Others seem to be for a 3-valve F. There certainly would have been no benefit from having a 5th valve on my Eb for what I had to play last week on it.
Chuck(G) wrote:I've got one of these strange Italian basses (made by Orsi):
It's in Eb and has a tiny 0.495 bore and takes a tenor-shank trombone mouthpiece. For the bore size, it's surprisingly free-blowing, but takes some real technique getting a good sound down in the lower register.
I can't be sure even what the "authentic" idea of a cimbasso is (maybe a six-valve bimbonifono is also a cimbasso?), but the examples I've seen all have fairly small bores.
And this one has the amazing ability to suspend itself from a (rug covered) ceiling.
On an Eb cimbasso, just having the 5th valve to play the Ab below the staff is worth it for me. Plenty of those in the repertoire. Besides, I find it pretty interesting to monkey around with the cimbasso on stuff that it wasn't intended for like solos and the like. Makes for pretty interesting sight reading.
My opinion for what it's worth...
Principal Tuba - Miami Symphony, Kravis Pops
Tuba/Euphonium Instructor - Florida International University,
Broward College, Miami Summer Music Festival
I've got one of them home-built jobbies, too. It's in Eb, and I cobbled the bell together from a french horn bell and sheet brass. This thing works great!
Jay has a valid point about the usefullness of the 5th valve for the Ab if you don't have a first slide to pull. My horn has a long enough 1st slide that is accessable to pull to bring the Ab in tune. Even the low F is workable that way. It does not have a low E-natural. I'd be interested in knowing more about your horn, Jay. Any chance for you to post a picture and details for us?
I'd be happy to post photos and information regarding my cimbasso. However, I don't have webhosting space set up for the photos. Perhaps someone would agree to post them for me if I emailed them?
My opinion for what it's worth...
Principal Tuba - Miami Symphony, Kravis Pops
Tuba/Euphonium Instructor - Florida International University,
Broward College, Miami Summer Music Festival