Question about Franz Windhager (WHF) mouthpiece
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 8:26 pm
In their online catalogue in English, it seems WHF has following six backbores with a throat of 8.6mm.
----
W6 mixed form; 2/3 convex – 1/3 concave; very
wide bore
E6 very bowl-shaped; very warm, full sound; light
compromises in slotting
D6 slightly bowl-shaped; round, warm sound; open blowing with good slotting
C6 straight ; very direct response with sufficient
tone quality
B6 concave; very direct response; somewhat
more resistance; slight compromise in tonal
quality
S6 mixed form; 1/3 convex – 2/3 concave; narrow bore, nice sound
----
But, they seemed to also have F6, H6, J6, and M6 backbores now.
Does anyone know anything about these four backbores?
I tried several mouthpieces for my kaiser type BB tuba (PT50, Rudolf Meinl 0., Giddings Fossi, Giddings Baer CC Original, etc), and I have (for now) settled with a WHF mouthpiece (with a combination of BP10, B/H10, and W6). It works really nice for me, but wondered if I can improve it by switching a backbore.
----
W6 mixed form; 2/3 convex – 1/3 concave; very
wide bore
E6 very bowl-shaped; very warm, full sound; light
compromises in slotting
D6 slightly bowl-shaped; round, warm sound; open blowing with good slotting
C6 straight ; very direct response with sufficient
tone quality
B6 concave; very direct response; somewhat
more resistance; slight compromise in tonal
quality
S6 mixed form; 1/3 convex – 2/3 concave; narrow bore, nice sound
----
But, they seemed to also have F6, H6, J6, and M6 backbores now.
Does anyone know anything about these four backbores?
I tried several mouthpieces for my kaiser type BB tuba (PT50, Rudolf Meinl 0., Giddings Fossi, Giddings Baer CC Original, etc), and I have (for now) settled with a WHF mouthpiece (with a combination of BP10, B/H10, and W6). It works really nice for me, but wondered if I can improve it by switching a backbore.