Potential Danger of Doubling with Similar Size Mpcs?
Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Hey Folks,
I had been playing on the Greg Black Joseph Alessi pieces since last August...on trombone these are the absolutely most fabulous pieces I've ever played. However, after doing some extensive euphonium playing the last couple of months I've come to the conclusion that I can't get it to work for me on euphonium. I had a JA2 made, which is the deepest one available. This mouthpiece produces a GREAT sound on euphonium, but for me it is a ton of work...flexibility was very, very difficult for me. I tried to find other pieces which were similarly sized, but nothing I tried really satisfied me.
Just for the heck of it I popped in my old Schilke 51D, and it sounded great and responded great, just like I had remembered it. For a couple of weeks I really tried to make the JA pieces on trombone work while playing the much smaller 51D on euph. It wasn't working and by the time I finally got adjusted to one, it was time to swictch to the other.
I tried several Bach mouthpieces for trombone and found that I actually like a plain old Bach 5GS. The 5GS size (25.50 mm) is supposedly very close to a Schilke 51D (25.55 mm). The rims are shaped ever so slightly different, but as long as I'm concentrating I can make the switch pretty well. The 5GS has the same rim as the 5G, but it has a shallower cup...more like a 6.5AL and it is great for focusing your tone to produce a good trombone sound. But then I remembered the following issue cited from the OTJ trombone site Mouthpiece Meditations:
Should I be worried about this issue? The bottom line is do you think doubling with a 5GS on trombone and a Schilke 51D on euph will eventually have deleterious consequences for my amateur playing?
I had been playing on the Greg Black Joseph Alessi pieces since last August...on trombone these are the absolutely most fabulous pieces I've ever played. However, after doing some extensive euphonium playing the last couple of months I've come to the conclusion that I can't get it to work for me on euphonium. I had a JA2 made, which is the deepest one available. This mouthpiece produces a GREAT sound on euphonium, but for me it is a ton of work...flexibility was very, very difficult for me. I tried to find other pieces which were similarly sized, but nothing I tried really satisfied me.
Just for the heck of it I popped in my old Schilke 51D, and it sounded great and responded great, just like I had remembered it. For a couple of weeks I really tried to make the JA pieces on trombone work while playing the much smaller 51D on euph. It wasn't working and by the time I finally got adjusted to one, it was time to swictch to the other.
I tried several Bach mouthpieces for trombone and found that I actually like a plain old Bach 5GS. The 5GS size (25.50 mm) is supposedly very close to a Schilke 51D (25.55 mm). The rims are shaped ever so slightly different, but as long as I'm concentrating I can make the switch pretty well. The 5GS has the same rim as the 5G, but it has a shallower cup...more like a 6.5AL and it is great for focusing your tone to produce a good trombone sound. But then I remembered the following issue cited from the OTJ trombone site Mouthpiece Meditations:
"Citing Vincent Bach as a source, Reginald Fink warns that switching between mouthpieces with overlapping rim dimensions can cause embouchure problems. This warning is based on a theory that over time a groove is worn into the lips by the erosion of fat particles from within the muscles of the lip by the pressure of the mpc rim. According to Fink, playing more than 45 minutes at a time with a mouthpiece of slightly different rim size than the players usual choice disrupts the groove, affecting placement and control"
Should I be worried about this issue? The bottom line is do you think doubling with a 5GS on trombone and a Schilke 51D on euph will eventually have deleterious consequences for my amateur playing?