Page 1 of 3
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:41 am
by Tubadork
BBb vs. CC
talk amongst your selves

Bill
Re: pistons vs rotors
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:33 am
by Lew
Porky wrote:I listen to a lot of players. Most of my friends in school play piston tubas like Jupiter.
I think the really good tuba players play rotory tubas.
Piston tuba players just arent as good.
I play a rotory Jupiter, btw.
(OK, I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but couldn't resist) You mean like piston horn players (in no particular order) Alan Baer, Carol Jantsch, Sam Pilafian, Pat Sheridan, etc... just to name a few.
Re: pistons vs rotors
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:14 pm
by corbasse
Lew wrote:
(OK, I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, but couldn't resist) You mean like piston horn players (in no particular order) Alan Baer, Carol Jantsch, Sam Pilafian, Pat Sheridan, etc... just to name a few.
Yeah, just imagine what amazing feats they'd be capable of if they just switched to rowtorry instrements!
Re: pistons vs rotors
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:21 pm
by TexTuba
corbasse wrote:Yeah, just imagine what amazing feats they'd be capable of if they just switched to rowtorry instrements!
Just even thinking about thinking it would make my head explode.
Ralph
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:25 pm
by Chuck(G)
I think rotary valves must be some sort of a high school thing. Just about every high school tuba player I've met wants to play a rotary valved tuba.
But then, maybe there's some logic in this. Up until about, oh, 5 years ago, if a school purchased a rotary BBb, it was most likely a Miraphone 186. The 186 is really a very good instrument in the firmament of student-model tubas.
So maybe the kids aren't nuts after all...
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:34 pm
by MartyNeilan
Now that we have pistons vs rotors out of the way...

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:17 pm
by windshieldbug
MartyNeilan wrote:Does Size Matter?

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:23 pm
by windshieldbug
the elephant wrote:Nah. He's not compensating for anything . . .
Well, here's another non-compensating "compensating" tuba...

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:39 pm
by kegmcnabb
windshieldbug wrote:
Hey...maybe if I play this
really big tuba,
no-one will notice that
I'm the
bald guy in the orchestra.

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:59 pm
by Bandmaster
pistons vs rotors
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:08 pm
by TubaRay
My guess is that size matters.
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:13 pm
by MaryAnn
pistons vs rotors
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:05 pm
by TubaRay
richland tuba 01 wrote:I got your size right here buddy.
Yeah! Right!!!
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:02 pm
by mTaUrBkA
I'm a high school tuba player who plays a mirafone 186, and I think I have the answer of why many students think rotary horns are better........
You start out in middle school playing on a beat up student 3/4 yamaha with three upright pistons.....or something similar. I didn't realize it until I thought about it after reading this thread......but have any of you seen a young tubist start out on a beat up 3/4 student rotor horn? Kids probably get the impression that they don't put rotors on student horns....they must be good. If they see a piston horn they think of the piece of junk they started on.
My opinion is it is all preference. I have played some piston horns and loved them, and played some rotors and loved them. Personally I prefer rotors, but it's what I'm used to playing on. My ring finger and pinky aren't as strong as my index and middle finger.....so I had the springs loosened a little bit on my 3rd and 4th valve to make my valves feel more even and comfertable. To my knowledge, that can't be done on a piston horn, but I'm sure pistons have their little tricks as well. I'd say it would completely be a preference thing.... just play on the horn that fits you best.
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:13 pm
by mTaUrBkA
My second theory.......maybe they just don't want to have pistons like trumpets because trumpet players are too cocky! Just a theory!
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:59 pm
by iiipopes
Yeah -- what bloke and mTaUrBkA said.
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:32 am
by MartyNeilan
mTaUrBkA wrote:.....so I had the springs loosened a little bit on my 3rd and 4th valve to make my valves feel more even and comfertable. To my knowledge, that can't be done on a piston horn, but I'm sure pistons have their little tricks as well.
On a piston horn you can just replace the springs with varying strengths. I have often had them replaced with harder ones. Yeah, I tried stretching the stock ones but it is just better to replace them. I am sure lighter ones are available too - just ask a repair
guru.
My old Cerveny F has an interesting device on each valve that lets you crank up or down the
clockspring tension, I think they were the only company to do that. Mirafone had something on their spiral springs for a couple of years and went away from it.
Marty "currently a rotor guy"

Re: pistons vs rotors
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:43 am
by XtremeEuph
Lew wrote:
rowtorry instrements!
Holy ****!
why waste time talking about it?
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:38 pm
by Getzeng50s
go practice!

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:37 pm
by pulseczar
Pistons are very basic and pretty easy to repair.
Rotors are a b!tch to repair
I played a top piston tuba before switching to rotary, and rotaries definitely beat top pistons. I hate taking the second tuning slide out to empty the spit.