rotary F and piston C... feel and air... consistancy
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:20 pm
Question for some of you long time pros who have bought and sold many times over.
I am currently pretty happy with my stable of tubas. But as a result of a week in Aspen as well as some heavy contemplation, I decided I need some outside influence.
Currently, my MW2000 and MW2165 get the bulk of my work (as far as practice time) as they are my most current horns and I am at the point where I'm as comfortable with those as I had been with other tubas I had owned for awhile.
Now here's where somewhat of a variable comes in. I've had this F tuba, a miraphone 181 that I've recieved many complements on. I bought this tuba when I was also using a 186 C and had no problems getting the two horns to cooperate with each other, especially if I was not exactly balancing my practice as I like. Being they were both rotary, among other things, I didn't have any notice of things acting up.
As I'm sure many of you know, the rotary Miraphone F and the piston Meinl C's blow about as different as can be. I love my meinl C's so getting rid of them is kinda out of the question, so far.
Where I'm going with this is to consistancy. I recently played a great tuba that Warren Deck was letting one of his students at Aspen use (it was some kinda 182 or 2182 that had a real set of big valves on them... not the modifications that meinl did into production). I had a hell of a time getting the thing going as I expected it to blow in some way comparable to my F. WRONG... But I noticed when I blew it more like my 2000, everything cleared up and away I went. This is what got me to wondering if I am forcing myself to work too hard with these contrasting airstreams I am using. Of course I never noticed it before because I had put the time in to make the horns sound good, but I do come up against frusterations.
Enough rambling
Got 2c?
If you'd rather not post your answer, please email me at Rascaljim@yahoo.com
Please, I'm not looking for outside opinion, I'm hoping someone has had a similar experience or advice in the like.
Sorry for the length
Jim Langenberg
I am currently pretty happy with my stable of tubas. But as a result of a week in Aspen as well as some heavy contemplation, I decided I need some outside influence.
Currently, my MW2000 and MW2165 get the bulk of my work (as far as practice time) as they are my most current horns and I am at the point where I'm as comfortable with those as I had been with other tubas I had owned for awhile.
Now here's where somewhat of a variable comes in. I've had this F tuba, a miraphone 181 that I've recieved many complements on. I bought this tuba when I was also using a 186 C and had no problems getting the two horns to cooperate with each other, especially if I was not exactly balancing my practice as I like. Being they were both rotary, among other things, I didn't have any notice of things acting up.
As I'm sure many of you know, the rotary Miraphone F and the piston Meinl C's blow about as different as can be. I love my meinl C's so getting rid of them is kinda out of the question, so far.
Where I'm going with this is to consistancy. I recently played a great tuba that Warren Deck was letting one of his students at Aspen use (it was some kinda 182 or 2182 that had a real set of big valves on them... not the modifications that meinl did into production). I had a hell of a time getting the thing going as I expected it to blow in some way comparable to my F. WRONG... But I noticed when I blew it more like my 2000, everything cleared up and away I went. This is what got me to wondering if I am forcing myself to work too hard with these contrasting airstreams I am using. Of course I never noticed it before because I had put the time in to make the horns sound good, but I do come up against frusterations.
Enough rambling
Got 2c?
If you'd rather not post your answer, please email me at Rascaljim@yahoo.com
Please, I'm not looking for outside opinion, I'm hoping someone has had a similar experience or advice in the like.
Sorry for the length
Jim Langenberg