new dennis wick mouthpieces

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Jonathan Cruz
bugler
bugler
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:13 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

new dennis wick mouthpieces

Post by Jonathan Cruz »

hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew about the new wick mouthpieces. I got to try out a couple and was impressed. The outside looks quite nice compared to the old design. Does anyone know if the the rest of the mouthpiece was changed? I liked the 2L much better than my current mouthpiece, but unfortunatly, with an overgrown alex 164, it swallows just about any shank I put in there. Looks like Doug Elliot's getting a call soon.
Jonathan Cruz
BBb Bass
Brass Band of Central Florida
www.bbcf.net
winston
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Post by winston »

.
Last edited by winston on Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Winston Hind
The Naden Band of the Royal Canadian Navy
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

To bump this thread up, for a comment and a question:

Comment: from looking at http://www.deniswick.com , it looks like all of the tuba mouthpieces are now being made to the new exterior profile, while keeping the same listed specs: overall diameter, rim diameter, cup diameter, throat diameter & type of backbore.

Question: has anyone played and compared the same model in old vs new profile? I like my old style #1 for my Besson, I'm wondering if the apparent thinning of the exterior rim along with the apparent adding of mass to the throat area makes any noticable difference in tone, responsiveness, intonation, etc.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Post by Donn »

iiipopes wrote:Question: has anyone played and compared the same model in old vs new profile? I like my old style #1 for my Besson, I'm wondering if the apparent thinning of the exterior rim along with the apparent adding of mass to the throat area makes any noticable difference in tone, responsiveness, intonation, etc.
I haven't, but if anyone wants to trade an old style #2 for my new style, I'd be up for that if it isn't too chewed up. I don't expect to hear any difference in the sound - I can't imagine that he changed the interior dimensions, and differences due to exterior dimensions are too mystical for me. Honestly I just think the new one looks dorky, and since I don't like the way my #2 sounds, I may as well have one that looks good.

I do like my #5 (old style.) It has some plating loss, no real problem for me. I wonder if lacquer might be a quick fix for someone who is sensitive to metals.
Post Reply