Page 1 of 2

High dollar celebrity horn dorn...

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:30 pm
by poomshanka
Ever wonder what $175,000 worth of tubas looks like in a lineup? Well, a few of us who don't live by Dillon's, Baltimore Brass, WWBW et al found out today. Norm Pearson, Chuck Koontz, Justin Jerome, Greg Koprowski and I got together in Crowell Hall at Biola University for a three-hour low blow.

Horns included in the lineup pic:

Gronitz PCM, rotary Willson 3050, Yamayork A (Norm's), Meinl Weston Baer (machine made variant), Yamayork B (says "Yamaha" on the pink slip), Meinl Weston Thor (formerly Norm's), handmade 4/4 Nirschl, Hirsbrunner HB-2P, and a Miraphone 188 (formerly Tommy Johnson's, now Norm's). The one horn missing from the lineup pic was a 6/4 Nirschl. It can be seen in the pic with Chuck, though.

We were all quite impressed to find that there wasn't a turkey in the bunch. In fact, they were all great horns, but each in its own way.

Norm at Tubahenge (click here for a big version)...

Image


Chuck in the Ring of Fire (click here for a big version)...

Image


The Usual Suspects (click here for a big version)...

Image


Sorry for the poor quality of the pixx. I should've brought a tripod...

And a real photographer...

With a real camera...

...Dave

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:22 pm
by The Big Ben
Lovely horns, all...

But....

WHERE are the King 1140s? Now, THERE'S a horn!

Jeff "Plays his 1140 as well as he would any other horn" Benedict

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:38 pm
by WoodSheddin
You can't leave us hangin like that. Details, details!!!

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:01 pm
by Dave Hayami
Dave,
Sure wish you would have given me a heads up.
Dave Hayami

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:26 pm
by Dylan King
Should have called me too. My Yorkbrunner would have put all of those tubas to shame, and I am a pro photographer.

Next time perhaps.

-DK

Image

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:27 pm
by Dylan King
Although I do think your photos are excellent. :D

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:27 pm
by poomshanka
Dave Hayami wrote:Dave,
Sure wish you would have given me a heads up.
Dave Hayami
Sorry about that, man. Next time we'll definitely keep you in the loop...

...D

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:31 pm
by Dylan King
As I'm anti-union, an apostolic Christian, and little on the "strange" side of the tracks, I don't really expect to get invited to anything anyway. But I would most likely attend something like that next time.

I love you all nonetheless.

-DK

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:49 am
by poomshanka
WoodSheddin wrote:You can't leave us hangin like that. Details, details!!!
Well, the following are my own personal observations on the way the horns played and sounded. I won't presume to speak for others in attendance who - in beltway parlance - live and thrive FAR above my paygrade...

Yamayorks
Broad, omnipresent. Not the most core-laden sound I've ever heard, but when you dig in, it sure fills up a room. Fills up a room soft, too - which may be good or bad, depending on your perspective. Smooth, even sound on more lyrical excerpts like Prokofiev 5 and American in Paris. Would've liked a little more aggression in the sound on something like Fountains. Preferred the sound and feel of one Yamayork over the other, and there was a bit of a weight difference between the two (newer axe was heavier). It's been said this horn has its own voice, and I'd have to say I agree with that statement. It's an earthmover, for sure, but it doesn't seem to have that little sense of heat in the center of the sound that I like. Just my preference. Very, very nice player, though.

Baer
Next to the Yamayorks, I'd call this around a 5.5/4 horn. Around 15% less bacon fat in the sound, but a really nice sense of clarity that the Yamayork just didn't have. Very nice voice for something soloish like American in Paris, and a great combination of cutting, but broad sound for something like Fountains or those heinous fast, low runs in Mahler 5. Very easy low end, and from what I've heard, the handmade variants are even easier to play. A similar sense of punch to the sound that the Thor had, but scaled up 15-20%. Both listening and playing, this was my favorite horn.

6/4 Nirschl
Slightly fatter sound than the Baer, but a nice sense of point as well.

Thor
Norm calls it point-n-shoot, and I wouldn't disagree! I think for me, this thing kinda defines "5/4 horn". Not an 800 pound gorilla like the Yamayorks, but definitely a bigger presence than the 188, HB-2P, PCM, etc. Excellent scale, and can be brutal if it has to be. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give the low end a solid 7.5. It's definitely there, but nothing that made my head spin around. I liked the basement on the Baer better.

Willson rotary 3050
Somewhere between the Baer and the Yamayork in terms of size, and more like the Baer in terms of point in the sound. Very energetic low end, better than most of the others. Nice sense of character soft as well.

PCM
Nice presence of sound, and the low register is FUN! Not as much bite in the sound as the 4/4 Nirschl, but it feels *very* similar to the Yamayorks in terms of response. For a quintet horn, the PCM might be a fine choice. Don't be fooled, though - it can still throw out some quality weight in larger ensemble settings.

Hirsbrunner HB-2P
Very easy player, and can generate some really nice sound. Can be quite dark, but with the right mouthpiece, I think you could heat the sound up.

4/4 Nirschl (handmade)
Great axe! I didn't find the low end as quickly as I did with the other horns, but it's definitely there. No surprises that it shares a lot of playing and sound characteristics with its big brother. There was a bit of fire in the sound that the HB-2P and PCM didn't quite have.

188
Provenance and run-in time that few horns will ever enjoy. Considering who aligned the horn's molecules over the years, it's no surprise that this horn is something special. Surprising sense of mass for a 4/4 horn, but with a strong sense of Miraphone-ish clarity to the sound.

As I mentioned in my first post, no dogs. Finding something criticial to say about these horns is about like using a magnifying glass to find a freckle on a supermodel's butt. Each horn had its own unique voice, and Norm, Chuck, Justin and Greg all sounded different than each other on the same horns. Just as the same paintbrush in the hands of different artists yields all different kinds of results, these horns are just tools. Hearing four great players rotating through a great collection of axes really drove home the point that "what horn/mouthpiece so-and-so was using on such-and-such recording" is really only the very beginning of any musical journey.

So again, as I always say -just my $.02, your mileage may vary. These opinions don't necessarily reflect the views of anyone else in attendance.

Can I qualify that any more?

:wink:

...Dave

Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:55 pm
by Kyle Turner
Hi Dave.
This is one of the most interesting posts I have seen here. To have gathered all of those -not easy to get instruments, pictures, great players, in a good hall, and review them, really satisfies the curiosity. Or at least mine. And what you said about same paint brushes, different artists is right on.
Thanks for sharing it with us.
Kyle

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:26 pm
by JB
Kyle Turner wrote:Hi Dave.
This is one of the most interesting posts I have seen here. To have gathered all of those -not easy to get instruments, pictures, great players, in a good hall, and review them, really satisfies the curiosity. Or at least mine. And what you said about same paint brushes, different artists is right on.
Thanks for sharing it with us.
Kyle
Ditto. Now, if I only had a spare $175,000 sitting around to play with...

JB

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:16 am
by poomshanka
JB wrote:Ditto. Now, if I only had a spare $175,000 sitting around to play with...

JB
I think Norm was thinking the very same thing. I can see it now - some type of on-stage robotic turret system that would call up whatever horn he needed for a given bar of music.

Rick D., could you get on this? Thanx...

...D

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:14 am
by Dylan King
I think Norm would do just fine on a Mirafone 184 if that was all he had, after all, Roger Bobo certainly did.

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:30 am
by poomshanka
Kyle Turner wrote:Hi Dave.
This is one of the most interesting posts I have seen here. To have gathered all of those -not easy to get instruments, pictures, great players, in a good hall, and review them, really satisfies the curiosity. Or at least mine. And what you said about same paint brushes, different artists is right on.
Thanks for sharing it with us.
Kyle
Yes, a rare collection indeed. It really was a hornmonic convergence (oooh... that's pretty unforgiveable).

:wink:

I'd have to say that as different as everyone may have sounded on any given horn, the relative differences in one player's results across the entire group was - to my ear, anyway - about the same. I hope that makes sense.

...D

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 2:34 pm
by poomshanka
Doc wrote:In other words, Norm still sounded like Norm on all the horns, Chuck still sounded like Chuck on all the horns, etc...?
Yes, this would be a correct assessment. To my ear, the relative difference between horns was pretty close for everyone, e.g. everyone seemed to sound a little clearer on the Baer than they did on the Yamayorks, a little smaller on the Thor than they did on the Baer, etc.

I was at Gene's clinic yesterday too. His statement about sinus cavity size affecting sound further reinforces in my mind that "it ain't the horn" so much as "it's the player".

...Dave

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:36 pm
by Rick Denney
poomshanka wrote:Rick D., could you get on this? Thanx...
Sure. But you won't like my billed rate. Shall I send you a contract?

Rick "whose bosses will be thrilled" Denney

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:38 pm
by Rick Denney
Doc wrote:I think we all basically sound like ourselves no matter what we play...
Rick "sigh." Denney

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:35 pm
by poomshanka
Rick Denney wrote:
poomshanka wrote:Rick D., could you get on this? Thanx...
Sure. But you won't like my billed rate. Shall I send you a contract?

Rick "whose bosses will be thrilled" Denney
Sure, you can send it to my attention c/o the L.A. Phil/Walt Disney Concert Hall. I'm sure the fact they've never heard of me or this multi-million dollar project will be a small matter, and will be easily and quickly resolved.

:wink:

...D

Re: Thanks for the comparison

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:47 pm
by Rick Denney
poomshanka wrote:...quickly resolved.
The British are particular adept at the succinct reply in such circumstances, and I know what they would say: Piss off.

Rick "a tender, sensitive soul who wouldn't be able to tolerate such abuse" Denney

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:26 pm
by Rick Denney
bloke wrote:btw, I saw no fiber-Martin onstage...??
Even world-class performers sometimes get it wrong.

Rick "who bought some epoxy this weekend" Denney