Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:25 am
Not even a good attempt of making a thread run wild.
Klaus
Klaus
They're the same if you're an ivory tickler, but if you have an instrument where tuning can be varied so you can play justly-tempered intervals (like a tuba), enharmonics are not, strictly speaking, identical.cc_tuba_guy wrote:Not only are they close, they are enharmonic equivilents. That means that even though they are notated differently, the actual pitches are identical.
He's right.Chuck(G) wrote:They're the same if you're an ivory tickler, but if you have an instrument where tuning can be varied so you can play justly-tempered intervals (like a tuba), enharmonics are not, strictly speaking, identical.
I attack notes based on their fuction and not their name.. so Cb written as a b9 over a Bb7 chord would be approached differently than B written as the 7th in a C#7 chord. That's when approaching performance music, though. When playing archival music(ie classical) I reckon most people just play what's on the page.. no real difference between Cb and B once it's written down anyways.Tom B. wrote:OK. I've gotta ask.
Does anybody on this board actually attack a Cb differently than they attack a B?
Actually, they need only lean over and ask the harpist (whose instrument is keyed in C flat).mandrake wrote:[and if I were to tell a pianist to play "C flat" they would likely say "that doesn't exist; you mean B". .