Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:39 pm
Again, Ladies and Gentlemen, the problem has been resolved as good as it's going to get on a 36 year old tuba that suffered through some school system before being brought back to life and sold to me very inexpensively. Granted, the shorter bell means that the braces on the bugle past the tuning slide may be off a little bit, but with the number of braces on a 186 that would cause more than just one note to be out. I'm sure that this re-proportionment of cylindrical vs conical tubing has also narrowed the octaves slightly, but I can deal with it, as I don't have extreme range as a player. If my range ever gets that good, I'll get another tuba. One day if I decide to keep it for more than a couple of years I'll replace the dogleg. If not, I'll sell it as is, as I know I can get the $2k back out of it as I put into it. The deciding factors will be personal finances and whether or not I think I have an application for using the recording bell somewhere the souzy won't do.
Thanks to all of you for all of your input. Seriously. It has all been very helpful in analyzing and isolating the problem. I really do appreciate all the different viewpoints. In a pre-internet world this amount of good advice would have taken hours of correspondence, postage expense, and a massive long distance telephone bill otherwise. It is now time for this thread to end.
Thanks to all of you for all of your input. Seriously. It has all been very helpful in analyzing and isolating the problem. I really do appreciate all the different viewpoints. In a pre-internet world this amount of good advice would have taken hours of correspondence, postage expense, and a massive long distance telephone bill otherwise. It is now time for this thread to end.