Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:50 pm
by bttmbow
I know that Brasswind has them listed on their website. I know that they are quite affordable. I know that Andrew Hitz plays one. Sam Pilafian also helped in the R & D for this horn, and said good things about it.
I HAVE NOT played one yet, but look forward to trying one.
There was a Pat and Sam "youtube" thing posted about a year ago, that Sam played this horn on; I think it was in a nursing home!(sorry, Sam!)
Someone should dig that up from the "archives" for us to enjoy again.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:15 pm
by Tubaguy56
Hey everyone,
I've played 4 or 5 of these jupiter horns now, and a great deal of the studio here has them now, and they are great horns. Sam's in particular is probably one of the best C's I have ever played in terms of control, intonation, and cleanliness. I had the same reaction when I heard it was jupiter, but this is definitely a horn you must try to believe. so, before you poo poo jupiter, try the horn first
Bo Atlas
Tuba Performance major
Arizona State University
PS: Just to clarify, sam and pat both worked on these horns.
PPS: the youtube video was taken offline
PPPS: if i had to pick between a 1291 and this horn, i'd buy this horn....
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:45 am
by Bandmaster
I
posted info from the NAMM Show last January about this tuba including this photo...
I thought it played pretty good!
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:55 am
by geomiklas
All of those spit valves can either be a good thing or a bad thing. For maintenance purposes, the spit valves might be a bad thing. But right now, I am playing wet and spit valves might be a good thing as I have to roll the horn to get spit out of the 4th and main. Every 3* minutes (or in between songs) I drain my main, 4th and 5th slides. If I wait to 5* minutes, the horn gurgles.
gm
* approximate time
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:39 am
by TonyZ
I heard Andrew Hitz play one with Boston Brass. Although he would sound great on a copper coil with a bent dime for a mouthpiece, this horn did not seem to have the projection or body that I was used to hearing from him. It's a wee bit too wee for me.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:52 pm
by MikeMason
And the prices will rise to reflect the quality,thus negating the useful niche the brand now fills.And something else will come along to fill that niche,and here we go again...
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:54 pm
by Tubaguy56
582=not a good comparison....
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:35 pm
by MartyNeilan
the elephant wrote:

Is it just the lighting, or does that York bell look more "red" than the rest of the horn?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:43 pm
by The Big Ben
MartyNeilan wrote:the elephant wrote:

Is it just the lighting, or does that York bell look more "red" than the rest of the horn?
The bell does look redder. York bell, MW body, different metals for each? The York bell looks as if it has at least some lacquer on it.
York Bell
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:15 pm
by Frank Ortega
I believe I was told that York made their horns with a very high copper content. Maybe even Rose Brass which accounts for their great sound.
F. Ortega