Gronitz PCK vs Meinl Weston Thor
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:16 pm
"Thor" or "PCK"?
Which is your favorite? (and why?)
Which is your favorite? (and why?)
I'd get the PCK just so I didn't have to deal with the MW/B&S/VMI "big valves."
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:22 pm
I haven't played either one, but...
I'd get the PCK just so I didn't have to deal with the MW/B&S/VMI "big valves."
I'd get the PCK just so I didn't have to deal with the MW/B&S/VMI "big valves."
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:42 pm
That's what I heard from other poeple, I also think that the Thor's prices are resonable. Do you belive that finishes on the Thor would also make some differences? (Silver vs Lacquer)Greg wrote:The intonation was easier to keep on target and the notes slotted easier. The THOR also seems to make playing with clarity easier. The THOR seemed to have more core to the sound and produces a more aggressive sound.
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:47 pm
Greg....I have just now realized where your avatar picture is from......
Dr. Strangelove I presume???
I just saw that film for the first time the other day....very funny!
Dr. Strangelove I presume???
I just saw that film for the first time the other day....very funny!
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:52 pm
Silver is pretty but it tarnishes if you let it sit out. Lacquer doesn't tarnish, but it can scratch and wear through in time. I like the look of silver, but I'm not willing to pay for it.Tubanese wrote:Do you belive that finishes on the Thor would also make some differences? (Silver vs Lacquer)
Rick "who can't think of any other differences" Denney
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:20 pm
Now I know why he looked so familiar when I first started watching the film. 
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:28 am
I did buy lacquer.I liked the horn I bought better than the others,it was cheaper,i'm tired of tarnish...
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:48 pm
I love my Thor, the pistons on the mine feel alot better than the ones on my 2155, it feels as easy as the valves on a baritone i have. I really enjoy it. Haven't played the other one.
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:48 pm
Good point.Scooby Tuba wrote:
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:43 pm
To those Thor owners,
I see, so the intonation, color, and the valve(?) are superb on the Thor. However, does it work really well in any ensemble? Like matching tone color to trombones, play darker or lighter, etc.
Also, how about the range? I know that they have really solid pedal notes, but what about the high range? Thanks for the reply(s) btw.
I see, so the intonation, color, and the valve(?) are superb on the Thor. However, does it work really well in any ensemble? Like matching tone color to trombones, play darker or lighter, etc.
Also, how about the range? I know that they have really solid pedal notes, but what about the high range? Thanks for the reply(s) btw.
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:14 pm
.........................
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:53 am
Any comments about the overdrive factor? Do either of these horns help keep things "in the box"?
Maybe it's just me, but I felt like the thor wanted me to turn on the afterburner.
Maybe it's just me, but I felt like the thor wanted me to turn on the afterburner.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:36 pm
bloke wrote:I don't own a Thor, but I view it as everything in a 4/4-5/4 the Miraphone 188 is not.rascaljim wrote:Any comments about the overdrive factor? Do either of these horns help keep things "in the box"?
Maybe it's just me, but I felt like the thor wanted me to turn on the afterburner.
' need a low range? ' got it.
' need a more open blow? ' got it.
' need piston valves? ' got 'em.
' still want the 188 intonation and clarity? ' got those, too.
' need a price that, for now, doesn't climb up into the XX,XXX range? ' barely got that - for now.
Funny. My impression of the Thor is that it got all the best features from a marriage of a Mira 186 (or 188, whateva) and a Willson 3050.