Tuba Comparison

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Himes
bugler
bugler
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:39 am

Tuba Comparison

Post by Himes »

Greetings,

I am looking for a 5/4 horn that has a large, resonant sound, but is diverse enough to use as a solo and chamber horn. In the running is the MW 2000, the MW 5450 "Thor," and the B&S Parentucci PT-6P. Has anyone played these three back-to-back? Has anyone just played these enough to give me a reasonable comparison on their sound/response/usefulness?

Thanks.
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: Tuba Comparison

Post by iiipopes »

Have you also considered the Rudy 45 or 50, the Miraphone 188 (small for a 5/4, but still substantial); or some of the other new M-W models?
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
MikeMason
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:03 am
Location: montgomery/gulf shores, Alabama
Contact:

Re: Tuba Comparison

Post by MikeMason »

Just my opinion-all of these would be a tad too big for me for the stated purposes.I'd be thinking mira 1291/1292 or maybe a rudy 3/4 CC.You just have to weigh which of the stated activities are a higher priority for you.It's certainly possible to use any of your proposed horns for any purpose,with enough chops.Getting an appropriate sound for quintet and solos would make me want something a little smaller.I like the idea of buying ugly,used,great functioning/sounding horns and getting a CC and an F for your available budget.If you shop hard,it's possible.
Pensacola Symphony
Troy University-adjunct tuba instructor
Yamaha yfb621 with 16’’ bell,with blokepiece symphony
Eastman 6/4 with blokepiece symphony/profundo
User avatar
J.c. Sherman
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Tuba Comparison

Post by J.c. Sherman »

You could do far worse than the 2000 or the 188. Both great horns. I think the 188 is a little "tighter", and I think it feels more controlled at the softer dynamics. But it has pretty big b@[[s.

YMMV

J.c.
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium, Cleveland State University
Principal Tuba, Firelands Symphony Orchestra
President, Variations in Brass
http://www.jcsherman.net
THE TUBA
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:54 pm

Re: Tuba Comparison

Post by THE TUBA »

Earlier today, I did have a chance to play the three aforementioned horns within the same hour, and all three have distinct "feels" to the way they play. The THOR and PT-6 are both substantially larger than the MW 2000. I like to think of the 2000 as more of a 4/4 horn and the other two as mini-BATS. I think the 2000 will allow you to wear more hats, especially in small ensemble/solo settings, but it carries a hefty price tag. The THOR and PT-6 seem like they work great for large ensemble playing, but they might be a little large if you are looking for an all-around horn.
[/post]
Nick Pierce
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:00 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Tuba Comparison

Post by Nick Pierce »

I'll throw in two cents for the Miraphone 1291. Now that, in my humble opinion, is a true all round horn. Felt good for the big ensemble stuff, and the opening of the second movement of the Vaughan Williams felt and sound great on it.

The same could also be said of the MW 2145's I've tried, but I didn't like the sound quite as much.

My $.02.
Post Reply