Page 1 of 1
Re: Who has tried the Cerveny helicon?
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:01 am
by EdFirth
There's one here in town , about a year old and it plats just like you imagined . A Cerveny tuba that wraps around you . Perfect for those mounted on horseback gigs . The build quality is also excellent . Ed
Re: Who has tried the Cerveny helicon?
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:20 am
by David Richoux
I have owned one for a few years - plays very nice - big solid sound, in tune, good valve and linkage action (but the paddles are a bit prone to being bent sideways.) The hand position is not perfect for me - I have to rotate my wrist to the right just a bit - but it is not too uncomfortable for 3 hour gigs (with breaks.)
The mouthpiece position is good for me, with one bit. The body loop is smaller than most Sousaphones, so it might be a tight fit if you are "a Portly."
I bought mine unlacquered, but after a few weeks I had it coated at Best Music.
Re: Who has tried the Cerveny helicon?
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:07 pm
by Donn
Lighter than some 4 valve sousaphones I can think of, at 18.5 lbs.
Re: Who has tried the Cerveny helicon?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:18 pm
by David Richoux
Rubberlips wrote:
The hand position is not perfect for me - I have to rotate my wrist to the right just a bit - but it is not too uncomfortable for 3 hour gigs (with breaks.)
Thanks David - you confirm what I suspected from the Cerveny advertisement pictures. I have also seen some historical advertisements of marching military musicians having to bend their wrists at nearly impossible angles.
What a pity.
Ordinary sousaphones have their valve assemblies lined up correctly so that the hand meets them at a natural angle.
I saw a rotary valve helicon at a San Jose Tubafest Xmas one year with the paddles in perfect position - the valve cluster was in the same alignment as most piston helicon/sousaphones. It looked very comfortable! (sorry, no pictures or other info...)