blokepiece arrived
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:53 pm
Fetched my blokepiece on the post office today (rainy and cold, not my prescription for a stellar day).
Despite made by Houser, it is not built like a house. The immediate visual impression of the cup made me think of the Bach 12C trombone mouthpiece scaled up and with a short cylindrical portion near the rim, which is necessacy on bassbone and tuba mouthpieces, where the lips will buzz rather far into the cup in the lower range.
I tried it first on a tuba for which it was not specifically made: the 1870 Besson Eb with its small receiver and its very long cylindrical bore of about 0.635". I like the sound of that tuba, but I haven’t so far found a mouthpiece that will allow flexibility, range, and dynamic bandwith. Søren made that tuba sound very well through a Conn Helleberg with a turned down stem.
The unmodified blokepiece will sit tightly and with no wiggling in that small receiver. I got the feel of being in command of that tuba more than with other mouthpieces, especially the DW4 & 5, yet it didn’t crack up like with the DW1, which obviously is too big. The general picture was to my liking, but there are notes that I will have to work on. Bottom of the staff G is fine in attacked form, but it may be dull when entered in legato. That very likely is about the finer details of my technique having to adapt.
Next tuba was the one for which the blokepiece really was bought: the 1923 Boosey 3+1 compensator in F for which the PT-50, the Conn Helleberg, and the Mike Finn 3H were to large and the DW4 was too restricting. The blokepiece certainly brings out that bouncing response, which I also like in the YEP-641 and in the Besson 981. It doesn’t restrict my playing, and its wider cup diameter helps intonation. If anything it appeared slightly on the big side for pianissimo high range playing, but again I have to adapt myself. And that general co-spirituality between mouthpiece and instrument will make further work worthwhile.
I also tried the blokepiece on the 981. Very playable, but the sound became too shallow. The Boosey F and the 981 have the same bore, yet the 981 is a very much larger tuba better served by the MF3H. The blokepiece also was tried on my 1970 Besson New Standard BBb 3+1 compensator. Not the real thing for very low playing, but funnily enough it sounded like being good for playing marches. Very exact attacks.
Klaus
Despite made by Houser, it is not built like a house. The immediate visual impression of the cup made me think of the Bach 12C trombone mouthpiece scaled up and with a short cylindrical portion near the rim, which is necessacy on bassbone and tuba mouthpieces, where the lips will buzz rather far into the cup in the lower range.
I tried it first on a tuba for which it was not specifically made: the 1870 Besson Eb with its small receiver and its very long cylindrical bore of about 0.635". I like the sound of that tuba, but I haven’t so far found a mouthpiece that will allow flexibility, range, and dynamic bandwith. Søren made that tuba sound very well through a Conn Helleberg with a turned down stem.
The unmodified blokepiece will sit tightly and with no wiggling in that small receiver. I got the feel of being in command of that tuba more than with other mouthpieces, especially the DW4 & 5, yet it didn’t crack up like with the DW1, which obviously is too big. The general picture was to my liking, but there are notes that I will have to work on. Bottom of the staff G is fine in attacked form, but it may be dull when entered in legato. That very likely is about the finer details of my technique having to adapt.
Next tuba was the one for which the blokepiece really was bought: the 1923 Boosey 3+1 compensator in F for which the PT-50, the Conn Helleberg, and the Mike Finn 3H were to large and the DW4 was too restricting. The blokepiece certainly brings out that bouncing response, which I also like in the YEP-641 and in the Besson 981. It doesn’t restrict my playing, and its wider cup diameter helps intonation. If anything it appeared slightly on the big side for pianissimo high range playing, but again I have to adapt myself. And that general co-spirituality between mouthpiece and instrument will make further work worthwhile.
I also tried the blokepiece on the 981. Very playable, but the sound became too shallow. The Boosey F and the 981 have the same bore, yet the 981 is a very much larger tuba better served by the MF3H. The blokepiece also was tried on my 1970 Besson New Standard BBb 3+1 compensator. Not the real thing for very low playing, but funnily enough it sounded like being good for playing marches. Very exact attacks.
Klaus