Re: Tuba Fads that Acutally SUCK
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 10:41 pm
bell tone holes.
Tubaing wrote:bell tone holes.
I actually just placed first in a mock audition on a PT-50+ in my studio..... just saying.....tubashaman2 wrote:PT50+ mouthpieces and other large ones......dying out...
Yup -- that one would be laughable if it weren't so sad.ztuba wrote:Band Directors blaming the kelly mouthpieces for the bad playing of their kids.![]()
![]()
![]()
"where's your "REAL" mouthpiece?"
I too would be most interested in this Kelly mouthpiece business. I know of no tubist who uses one for concert work. The last time I used a plastic mouthpiece was when I was stationed in Alaska and it was 2 degrees outside (we used "bugle call" marches and it was just brass & percussion--ww players stayed inside)mceuph wrote:Someone please clear up the Kelly mouthpiece thing. I have never played a Kelly tuba piece, but have tried one of their 5G bone pieces, and it was HORRIBLE. No core to the sound, loss of definition in the high range...basically everything one would expect from a plastic piece. In fact, I've got a student coming in as a freshman music major next year who plays on one, and I've already insisted he get a metal mouthpiece. However, I see a few posts here inferring that these are good pieces on tuba. I personally can't see how these would be better than a metal piece in any situation except extreme weather conditions. Please let me know what I'm missing here.
No matter how true RC and bloke are in referring their experiences with this given mouthpiece, it actually may have worked for somebody.bloke wrote:Well, I'm one of those guys that:LJV wrote:tuben wrote:Orfeo "Deck" model mouthpieces"Why" would be as interesting to hear from people as much as "what" sucked.
So, why did these suck to you?
1 - Likes heavyweight mouthpieces
2 - LOVES huge mouthpieces (Bayamo is my normal piece, was old-style PT-10 in college)
But when I tried the Deck stuff in college, it just made everything sound dead. Flat, lifeless and dead.
RC
I think I'll have to second this. Years ago (around the time the Deck mouthpieces were first introduced) when I was selling some of the stuff that Orpheus was importing, I was offered one-or-any of these mouthpieces for (back then) a very attractive price. I tried them out (in their warehouse) for a while on several models of tubas...and declined.
Hey, I've got to disagree. The change on my Alexander was an improvement immediately noticed by every professional musician I asked, even the skeptics.the elephant wrote:Heavy valve caps…
Lacquer is easy, silver is preferred, raw brass makes your hand smell like... well, not good.the elephant wrote:Silver plate is bad, raw brass is good, lacquer is evil…
Aw, c'mon, you did it.the elephant wrote:Rotor "scooping"…
Yes, this definitely sucks.the elephant wrote:Leather belts, caulking, or lead tape wrapped around the bell near the flare…
hmmmm...the elephant wrote:Skeletonized mouthpieces…
Wait... too thin, too heavy, what the heck! You only like middle weight mouthpieces?the elephant wrote:Added mass mouthpieces…
This is kind of like adding racing stripes to your tuba. It makes a statement. No suck here.the elephant wrote:Rubber O-Rings on EVERY slide, even on ones you never move, when they are supposed to silence them when they are moved all the way in with a lot of force…
One of the single most stupidist ideas ever. Suck.the elephant wrote:Acousticoils…
OK, suck.the elephant wrote:Pocket Rocket….
pgym wrote:Any post by tubashaman2.
Ah-hahahaha!pgym wrote:Any post by tubashaman2.
They didn't for Warren.But when I tried the Deck stuff in college, it just made everything sound dead. Flat, lifeless and dead.
You're a braver man than I, Gunga Din!pgym wrote:Any post by tubashaman2.