my "new" King Eb
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:30 pm
So I picked this horn up from the greyhound today, and am letting it dry off now after giving it a bath. It plays really nice! It has a big fat sound on any note, and low C-A are like it's on overdrive! The false tones are OK, but I think I can get them better. The valves are great. It kinda reminds me of a 621F.
It is just a little bit flat, but has a long main slide so I can get about 2" cut there. I say that much as the receiver angle is a bit uncomfortable (but so was my Lyon & Healy). I think I'll try to get it more parallel to the or replace half of the leadpipe (2 pieces) so that it comes up straighter and perhaps just a bit higher.
The only note that seems a bit odd is 2nd partial Eb (slightly flat), but I don't think that will be a problem.
I actually have a lead on another one in very good shape with bad valves. I bet it'd kick *** with a 4 piston set (possibly a 5th valve). It has a .62x valve bore now. I don't know if .656 or .689 would be an improvement (except for the availability of such a valve set!) as the low range is pretty sweet.
No pictures of it with the slide flip, but here's one the owner sent me-
It is just a little bit flat, but has a long main slide so I can get about 2" cut there. I say that much as the receiver angle is a bit uncomfortable (but so was my Lyon & Healy). I think I'll try to get it more parallel to the or replace half of the leadpipe (2 pieces) so that it comes up straighter and perhaps just a bit higher.
The only note that seems a bit odd is 2nd partial Eb (slightly flat), but I don't think that will be a problem.
I actually have a lead on another one in very good shape with bad valves. I bet it'd kick *** with a 4 piston set (possibly a 5th valve). It has a .62x valve bore now. I don't know if .656 or .689 would be an improvement (except for the availability of such a valve set!) as the low range is pretty sweet.
No pictures of it with the slide flip, but here's one the owner sent me-