Page 1 of 1

37 years later...

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:07 pm
by TubaBobH
When I bought my King 1241UB in 1972, it came with a King 26 mouthpiece. The mouthpiece seemed perfectly matched to my King. The relatively deep depth of the mpc provided a very rich core of sound, and the bowl shape provided amble power and “bite” when desired. All-in-all, a great combination for my King. However, unfortunately I did not like the wide rim. It just didn’t seem to give me the control, flexibility or articulation I was used to from my old tried and true Bach 18 that I had used all through intermediate and high school. So, for the next five years I continued to use my 18 (my three remaining years of college and two years after college).

I then went back to grad school, started a career, a family…all of which resulted in a 27 year hiatus from the tuba. I resumed playing five years ago when my son started playing the trombone. I found that I still had the same “issue” with the King 26 (which I had kept all these years) – still loved the rich tone and the power reserve when needed – still couldn’t adjust to the wide rim. My old Bach 18 was really too beat up to play anymore. And now I found a whole new world of tuba mouthpiece choices that I did not know existed (and perhaps didn’t exist) back in the mid 60s through the mid 70s. So, during these last five years, I have tried a pretty sizeable number of mpcs. It was fun, and I guess, part of the tuba hobby experience. However, no single mouthpiece ever rose to the top of the heap and said “I’m the one for you and your King”…until now.

How did I find “the one”? A few weeks ago I was reading a post on TubeNet, and in that post I learned that the design of the Mike Finn MF1 was based upon my old King 26 mpc (with some improvements and updates). I was very intrigued and went to Mike’s website, where I learned that his MF-2B was also based upon the old King 26, but incorporated a less wide, more Bach 18, type of rim. The MF-2B seemed to have the potential of being exactly what I had been looking for

Well, the MF-2B arrived last week. And after a week of using it, all I can say is, I WISH THIS MOUTHPIECE HAD BEEN SHIPPED WITH MY KING 1241 37 YEARS AGO! (Maybe I would not have taken a 27 year break from playing the tuba. :D ) What a match. It has all of the great attributes of my original King 26, and then some, but with a rim that I find much more manageable and to my liking. Of course, my sound is my sound. It doesn't change much by mouthpiece. (We need to stay real here. No mouthpiece is going to make me, or anyone, a “better” player.) However, I honestly feel that this MF2-B mouthpiece makes it easier, or more natural, for me to maximize the quality of my playing on this instrument. I don’t think you can realistically ask much more of a mouthpiece than that. By the way, an interesting aside, during my communications with Mike I found out that he was actually playing a King tuba when he started designing his mouthpieces.

The net of all of this? If you play a king 1241, or I would assume, an old, or new, style King 2341 (same bore sizes, valve cluster package, fundamental design philosophies as the 1241), and if you are in the market for a good all around mpc, I would strongly suggest you consider giving either the MF-1 or the MF-2B a try. Finally, Mike was great to work with - very friendly, accommodating and professional.

Re: 37 years later...

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:46 pm
by Chriss2760
Welcome back, Bob. Sounds like you're having fun.

Re: 37 years later...

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:26 pm
by TubaBobH
Chriss2760 -
Welcome back, Bob. Sounds like you're having fun.
Thanks, and yes I am having a blast! I wish I had resumed playing years earlier. However, better late than never...

Re: 37 years later...

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:49 am
by ger
Someone able to comment on the MF1 or 2B compared to a Denis Wick 1L or 2L on a King 1240?

Re: 37 years later...

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:41 am
by ger
Thanks, that's what I was looking for. Although your teacher was right, I guess....

Re: 37 years later...

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:07 pm
by sloan
hrender wrote: However, I notice a pretty big difference in the sound and feel of different mouthpieces, and I would prefer to use a mouthpiece that allows me to start from a place that is closer to the sound I want to make rather than trying to make the mouthpiece sound like something else.
If you are producing "your sound" by mouthpiece selection, then it's not really "your sound". You should sound "like you" on nearly any equipment - when that's true, the difference will be in how much you have to work at it in order to produce that sound.

Find something middle-of-the-road and "just play the %^&* horn".