Page 1 of 1

Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:58 am
by jonesbrass
Okay, so all three of these BBb horns appear to be near carbon copies of each other. The Allora is the least expensive and made in China, the Cerveny is a little more expensive than the the Allora and is made in the Czech Republic, and the Miraphone is the all-time German classic.

Has anyone played and/or inspected each of these that can offer a comparison: tone, response, construction quality, etc.?

Many apologies if this has been discussed ad nauseum, but I couldn't find this comparison with the advanced search option.

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:35 pm
by Bob Kolada
I've never played the Cerveny and only played the Allora once. I still like the VMI 2103 better than all of them.

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:53 pm
by Chadtuba
I owned the Allora for a couple of years and had the chance to do a side by side with the Miraphone. The Allora was a heavier gauge metal and didn't have the ring around the bell; outside of that they were almost identical in every physical way. Playing wise, the Allora had a couple of flat notes compared to the Miraphone but nothing that I wasn't able to work around with some slide pulling and alternate fingerings. If you are looking for a budget horn I would have no problem suggesting the Allora, nor would I hesitate to purchase one again if the price was right.

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:05 pm
by SplatterTone
I have one along with a Miraphone 191. The Allora has more back pressure (or rather, the 191 has almost no back pressure) making it a little easier to play. The bigger bore of the 191 along with the thin brass of the bell gives it a more harmonically expansive sound (and I don't mean a more bassy sound). The Allora has good intonation, very easy to play on pitch. I do not do slide pulling.

Based on the recordings I have made, I'd have to say the Allora has a little more punch-through even if the solo sound doesn't seem as "big." I might have gotten lucky and ended up with an especially good one, but mine runs in tune with the main tuning slide about 1/2 inch out and all other slides in. Based on mine, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the horn.

Here are some sound samples from my church playing. No solo playing, but you can hear the horn in the context of a group which I suspect is probably how you are likely to use it.

Choir, organ and band. Not much to the tuba part. Pretty crummy, actually. Nothing but B flats for tuba for a while, but later there is enough to give you some idea of how it sounds in a group. Mouthpiece is a Kellyberg.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_15_ ... _cross.mp3

Here are a couple hymns where I put some muscle into it. The organ is a fifty-something rank Aeolian-Skinner. Audience is about 600 people. Choir about 70 people with microphones across the front of the group. Mouthpiece is probably a DEG Astro Nylon.
Bodacious opening hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn1.mp3
Mellower hymn with some attempt at sweet and pretty tuba playing.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn2.mp3

For comparison to the 191 and Astro Nylon.
The bodacious hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/hymn1.mp3
The choir and band (the shaky tempo at the beginning was not me)
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/river.mp3

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 8:42 pm
by Bignick1357
I own a 5 valve CC Miraphone 186 and I play in my concert band at my school of 60, a youth orchestra of 80, another youth concert band of 120, all of which I am one on my part and I hold up all of those quite well. But I also do all of my Allstate and district auditons on which I got first chair in so it works for everything. I do live in maine so it wasn't terribly hard but still it shows you the virsatility of the Miraphone 186 :tuba:

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:36 pm
by tubaman1019
I've played on a miraphone 186 and I currently own a Cerveny 686. The Cerveny is a great horn. I used it in everything from playing solos to full orchestra. As far a playability, I find the Cerveny and the miraphone to be very alike. I would say the miraphone can pack just a bit more punch. I've heard myself in recordings with orchestras, and the cerveny does just fine. Only thing a don't like about the cerveny is that the brass is a bit thin and dents easily.

P.S.
I will be selling my Cerveny 686 pretty soon after I get my Miraphone 1292 likely around Mid Feb-March. Send me a message if interested.

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:51 pm
by jonesbrass
tubaman1019 wrote:. . . As far a playability, I find the Cerveny and the miraphone to be very alike. . .
This is what I suspected. The three horns I listed are clearly copies of one another, although the Cerveny and Miraphone have a common Bohemian origin, I'm not sure which one came first.

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:21 pm
by Norm in Bellevue
SplatterTone wrote: Choir, organ and band. Not much to the tuba part. Pretty crummy, actually. Nothing but B flats for tuba for a while, but later there is enough to give you some idea of how it sounds in a group. Mouthpiece is a Kellyberg.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_15_ ... _cross.mp3

Here are a couple hymns where I put some muscle into it. The organ is a fifty-something rank Aeolian-Skinner. Audience is about 600 people. Choir about 70 people with microphones across the front of the group. Mouthpiece is probably a DEG Astro Nylon.
Bodacious opening hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn1.mp3
Mellower hymn with some attempt at sweet and pretty tuba playing.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn2.mp3

For comparison to the 191 and Astro Nylon.
The bodacious hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/hymn1.mp3
The choir and band (the shaky tempo at the beginning was not me)
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/river.mp3
Splatter Tone,

Thanks so much for these sound clips. As a Roman Catholic church musician, it's been so many years since I've heard these Protestant standards. And played on an Aeolian-Skinner no less! What a treat. And you and your 191 are keeping up with the 16' reed, too!