rim feedback

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: rim feedback

Post by imperialbari »

You may double the number of options by providing versions with indentations for the nose.

Klaus
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: rim feedback

Post by Wyvern »

So what is the smaller cup size? Does it have more rounded inner edge? Looks like may be from pictures
User avatar
Peach
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 701
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:42 am
Location: London, UK

Re: rim feedback

Post by Peach »

Rather than introduce another rim profile to offer a smaller cup opening, I'd rather see smaller versions of your two existing (very good) options. Adding another style could end up with folks requesting that contour in a different I.D.!

I'd love to see versions of both 'standard' rims in 32, 32.5, & 33mm personally.

You'd know better than anyone: Do folks complain about the current rim styles? I'd have thought rounded and flatish ought to suit most...

FWIW, I've been using my Solo #2 with a Loud 32mm rim (LM15) and it's great for me as a bass tuba piece.

MP
Peach
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: rim feedback

Post by cjk »

LJV wrote:I'm with Malcolm. A slightly smaller #2 would be nice. Just pull the whole thing (inner and out diameters) in 0.5 mm. Keep the rim width the same. A wide rim defeats the purpose of the smaller inner to me.

I agree with Malcolm and LJV.

Image

I would just make a #2 style rim with a 32.6 inner dimension ("close enough" to a Helleberg or Laskey 30 inner dimension), but the width and contour of the rim the same as the #2. You could call it a #1.6. :)

The #2 rim contour is unintentionally VERY similar to old Marzan rims. So the #2 (much like the old Marzans) is one of the most comfortable rims ever.
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: rim feedback

Post by Wyvern »

bloke wrote:I've recently been playing a much larger tuba.
2165?
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: rim feedback

Post by iiipopes »

Sounds like some cross-marketing with the LOUD rims is in order, for example the LM7 rim is a good rim in the @32.6 mm range.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Re: rim feedback

Post by MaryAnn »

What Klaus said; even though my upper lip is on the long side, large mouthpieces still bonk my nose. There are large people who do not have long upper lips who cannot play a large mouthpiece for the same reason. It gets painful at times, and too much lower lip produces a bad sound for a particular type of embouchure (Roger Lewis, in one of his very helpful posts about sound and technique, noted that someone who is using too much lower lip will get a nasal sound.)

MA

PS: Personally, I'm waiting for the KellyBloke.
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: rim feedback

Post by iiipopes »

bloke wrote:
iiipopes wrote:Sounds like some cross-marketing with the LOUD rims is in order, for example the LM7 rim is a good rim in the @32.6 mm range.
Not-at-all. I am specifically avoiding any "borrowing" of rim contours, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE Houser makes mouthpieces for both Joe Murphy and myself.

Further, no one who has emailed me has asked that I adapt an "LM-7 style" rim to these mouthpieces.

Finally, the Loud rims and Sellmansberger rims are not compatible. It would require complete re-tooling anyway to "steal" Joe Murphy's designs for use with my underparts.
I stand corrected and apologize. I thought the threading was the same.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
T. J. Ricer
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: rim feedback

Post by T. J. Ricer »

bloke wrote: ...but I'm certainly not so unsympathetic as to not be able to imagine that a "new" little piece of face playing the tuba may make one feel a bit "exposed"...

bloke "3% more lip to tighten / 3% more air to produce...whatever...' can be done......but my current leaning is to offer a #1 and a #2 with a 32.3mm cup diameter (perhaps a #1A and a #2A), and call it a day."

This sounds perfect, Joe. I love your MPs for just about everything, but sustained high playing (like the second movement of the Barbara York Concerto) does make me feel a bit hung out to dry with the wide openings. Maybe it's just my own personal hang-up, but I think that tiny "pulling in" would be ideal, even if it is just a psycho-somatic change. (Voice in my head: "This one's smaller, I'm invincible!" :mrgreen: )

thanks for allowing us to influence further development of your already great product!

be well,
T. J.
Thomas J. Ricer, DMA
Royal Hawaiian Band - University of Hawaii at Manoa - Yamaha Performing Artist

http://www.TJRicer.com

"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." -John Lennon
Post Reply