Page 1 of 1

Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:55 pm
by bort
Last week, I took my tuba up to Alan Baer to get fitted for a PVAK kit (which by the way, is great).

One thing he noticed about my tuba is that the leadpipe does not actually have a receiver -- the "receiver" is actually just a sleeve over the leadpipe itself, and the mouthpiece goes straight into the leadpipe.

I've heard about this before, but have to admit that I don't know much about it. Why are some tubas manufactured like this? Is there a reason for it? Pros/cons about this kind of setup? Thanks! :tuba:

Re: Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:20 pm
by Tuba-G Bass
My Rudy is that way, with no receiver.
Have no idea if it's better that way :tuba:

Re: Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:57 am
by keegan watson
My MW 32 CC is that way and I don't have any pros or cons for it other than the mouthpiece goes really far into my horn.

Re: Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:20 pm
by cjk
search old tubenet for "Matt Walters" and "gap".

You will find some discussion of the AGR and Matt mentions the positive and negative aspects of the receiverless setup.

Re: Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:51 pm
by joh_tuba

Re: Receiver-less leadpipe? Pro/con?

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:26 pm
by bort
Great, that helps a lot!