Page 1 of 2

Chicago Strike

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:04 pm
by Ben
Another Strike

A scary world out there...

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:28 pm
by Michael Bush
The CSO posted this on Facebook:
Today, the Chicago Federation of Musicians (CFM), Local 10-208 negotiating committee representing musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra (CSO), rejected proposals from the Chicago Symphony Orchestra Association (CSOA) for a three-year contract that would have provided musicians with a minimum base weekly salary of $2,795 in the first year, with increases to $2,835 and $2,910 in years two and three, respectively. The previous weekly base minimum salary is $2,785.

The last, best and final contract offered by the Association would have made the members of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra among the best-compensated in a U.S. orchestra, while also maintaining benefits such as 12 weeks of paid time off per year, a defined benefit pension plan, excellent health insurance and a minimum size of 106 orchestra musicians. The parties are chiefly at odds over wages and employee contributions toward health care costs.
I'm having a hard time seeing this as a horrifyingly unjust compensation package that one would strike rather than accept.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:43 pm
by aqualung
The scabs are lurking - - - - - - -

Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Selection Committee
220 S. Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois

Gentlemen:

I wish to apply immediately for the job of Second Trombone and I already have the two trombones. Although I have not played much in an orchestra, I have played along with lots of classic (no vocal) records. I found that if I slowed them down a little that the songs automatically went into the flat keys which are much easier, but I think I could do the sharp keys in a short time.
I was a student for several years of Mr. Remington (Buck, not Emory) and then went with the circus band where my tone really got great. You don't have to worry about me being able to blast through on the Vogner stuff, that's for sure.
After I watched "10", I got out my horn and worked up a really great solo on "Bolero", (do you know that there is a dance by this name too?) but I still have trouble knowing when to come in with the record. Does your arrangement sound the same all the way through, too? Anyway, I know that if I get the job that the people in Chicago will like my version which is do-wop. Would I have to sit real close to the violins? They never seem to play very loud and my tone sort of cuts off if I have to play too soft so it would be best if I could sit in front of the drums, like in the circus band. Also, I'd kind of like to sit on the outside so that people could see me.
I am practicing every day for the audition and am working on a new thing called legato, but it's still a little smeary. I think you'll like it though. But, if your music is anything like this Rubank stuff, it will be a challenge to my teck... techininuque... tequch... ability. There is a position on trombones called 5th, but hardly any notes are there. Does your music have many of these notes and if so, what are they? I'd like to know all of this before I pay bus fare down to Chicago and how much does the job pay?
I'm really looking forward to coming down, but why would I have to play behind a screen in the winter?

Sincerely,
Slide Rafferty

P.S. I have lots of music stands and probably have one like you guys use, so that would be a cost saving.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:48 pm
by sloan
Can he double on cimbasso?

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:08 am
by bort
Strikes suck. I hope this ends soon. I don't particularly think its necessary, but I guess for a job that is so rare and next to impossible to win, they've really got them by the balls on this. Its not like they can quit and go play somewhere else tomorrow.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:18 am
by tofu
talleyrand wrote:The CSO posted this on Facebook:
Today, the Chicago Federation of Musicians (CFM), Local 10-208 negotiating committee representing musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra (CSO), rejected proposals from the Chicago Symphony Orchestra Association (CSOA) for a three-year contract that would have provided musicians with a minimum base weekly salary of $2,795 in the first year, with increases to $2,835 and $2,910 in years two and three, respectively. The previous weekly base minimum salary is $2,785.

The last, best and final contract offered by the Association would have made the members of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra among the best-compensated in a U.S. orchestra, while also maintaining benefits such as 12 weeks of paid time off per year, a defined benefit pension plan, excellent health insurance and a minimum size of 106 orchestra musicians. The parties are chiefly at odds over wages and employee contributions toward health care costs.
I'm having a hard time seeing this as a horrifyingly unjust compensation package that one would strike rather than accept.
Average salary - $173,000

Plus many have additional income streams as they teach both privately and at the University level etc.

Anybody who works for a for-profit organization has most likely had to pay more out of pocket for health care for the last several years. Many have seen their 401K matches reduced and even eliminated. Few have defined benefit plans any more. It seems upside down that non-profits are immune to the current economic climate. As a patron of this particular orchestra it is hard to work up a lot of sympathy for this strike - especially when it was called with no time to notify 2000 concert goers that the Sat. night concert was cancelled because of the strike. Doing harm to your customer is no way to do business or gain support.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:59 am
by Michael Bush
bloke wrote:evil 1%-ers ?
That certainly isn't my perspective. Others can speak for themselves.

But a strike? With that kind of compensation? This under-warranted sense of entitlement and in some cases even victimhood long ago led to me to lose all sympathy with unions. A hundred years ago they were important. Now they are mostly a problem.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:16 am
by bisontuba
Hi-
We have seen one side's version of the labor dispute-NEVER jump to conclusions until BOTH sides have or will issue a statement(s).....

Mark

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:15 pm
by Michael Bush
Doc wrote:I'm not questioning the players. I want to grasp what a position like that really pays. Whether the pay is justified is a matter of opinion, mostly between that of the musicians, management, and the paying public. I think some of the negativity that will be heard over the numbers is a result of people living near the threshold of survival (most of us) who have a hard time accepting large salaries like that being fodder for striking. As for me, I certainly don't expect players of CEO-level talent and ability to make a mail-room-boy salary. It would be a near equal comparison in salary from one of their weeks to one of my months, but I also realize that I am not a top dog at a major police agency, so the comparison is really not valid. I also do not know the cost of living in Chicago, although I'm sure it's high, and I know salaries are often commensurate. I do know that if you work and establish a retirement fund up north, then move to Texas (Arkansas is even better), you're retirement check, which would have been modest up north, is quite robust down here.

The CSO (Jacobs/Herseth era) was my #1 favorite orchestra, and it still ranks at the top (not sure if I have a favorite today). I hope they work it out.
Great post. I completely agree that like the rest of us, they are worth what they can get an employer to pay them.

The reason I think this is bad strategy is the effect it could have on public perception of this orchestra and of orchestral musicians across the country (realizing that orchestras in other countries often have a different funding model).

Here is an organization whose least senior members' base salaries are the same range as the president of a small college, and it goes up from there. Fair enough, so far so good. I see no problem with that.

But on on that level of salary they don't want to take on an additional $1200 a year in health insurance cost, together with a base salary increase that partially covers it? And they don't want this so passionately that they are invoking the whole history of a "labor dispute" with all the cultural freight that carries in America, suggesting that this compensation is not only not what they think they are worth or could get, but that it is fundamentally unfair.

Any statement the union makes about this other than, "We're sorry. We used poor judgement. See you in Orchestra Hall," will have to be a miracle of public relations in order to keep this strike from damaging the whole cause of American orchestral musicians. It's very unfortunate, but I think that with the information we have now the musicians just look greedy and petulant, no doubt wrongly. But the perception is going to be hard to fight. I sincerely, sincerely hope that changes.

So I hope they work it out too, and do no harm to others in the process. I'm still quite willing to say this is my favorite orchestra, which is what makes the whole thing so regrettable. It will certainly be fascinating to watch.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:39 pm
by Chuck Jackson
bloke wrote: just too many strikes in Chicago, these days.

Take a look at the Cubs' batting averages.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the 2012 winner of TubeNet's Snappiest Reply of the Year!!! Absoluting frickin' brilliant Joe!!!!

Chuck"still snickering"Jackson

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:32 pm
by TubaTodd
tuben wrote:Post about a strike. Seems like this should be banned.
I disagree. This is a board dedicated to tubists/musicians and this is a real-world issue involving professional musicians. Sounds to me like an important topic.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:05 am
by Matthew Gaunt
Subject: CSO Musicians Seek Competitive Agreement in Line with Industry Peers and CSOA's Strong Financial Position
A copy of the press release of the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony
Orchestra is attached.

The Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra will provide additional
updates on their official Facebook page, which may be found at
http://www.facebook.com/csomusicians" target="_blank" target="_blank, and on Twitter at
http://www.twitter.com/CSOMusicians" target="_blank" target="_blank.

* * *

Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra Seek Competitive Agreement in
Line with Industry Peers and CSOA's Strong Financial Position

* Management Proposes Total Compensation up to 5% Lower Compared to Current
Top-Paid U.S. Orchestra, Compromising Artistic Integrity of Top-Ranked CSO
Musicians and Chicago's Competitive Edge in Symphonic Music

* Management Reported Record-Breaking Fundraising and Endowment Returns,
Strong Ticket Sales in Fiscal 2011

* Musicians Agreed to 2.5% Salary Reduction During Two Years of Recently
Expired Agreement

* Musicians Have Agreed to Significant Concessions During Current
Negotiation

* Musicians Regret Disruption for Patrons, Seek to Return to the Stage and
to Continue to Serve Classical Music Audiences in Chicago and around the
World

CHICAGO-On Saturday evening, September 22, 2012, the management of the
Chicago Symphony Orchestra Association (CSOA) made its last offer in
connection with its ongoing contract negotiation with the Musicians of the
Chicago Symphony Orchestra. For Musicians with families, the CSOA offer
would have represented 5% lower total annual compensation compared to the
current top-paid symphony orchestra in the United States, which recently
negotiated its own contract. Accepting the CSOA offer would have
represented an unprecedented concession by the Musicians of the Chicago
Symphony Orchestra, as well as an unprecedented risk to the Chicago
Symphony's artistic integrity and its competitiveness compared to its U.S.
peers.

Management's demands were made in the context of record-breaking fiscal 2011
results by the CSOA, the not-for-profit organization under which the
Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra perform. As disclosed in its
fiscal 2011 annual report, the CSOA's net assets grew nearly 20% in 2011, to
$262 million, and endowment investments reached a record $242 million as a
result of a 20% return together with bequests. CSOA operating revenues and
support grew 3.5% in 2011, to
$63.8 million. Overall ticket sales of $20.6 million in 2011 represented
more than 84% in paid capacity sold, an increase of 2%.
These ticket sales covered substantially all of the costs of Musician
salaries and benefits, which themselves represented only 36% of the CSOA's
total expenses in 2011. The CSOA experienced a modest operating deficit of
less than $950,000, or approximately 1.5% of its operating budget in 2011,
compared with an operating surplus of
$41,000 in 2010.

Recently, the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra were ranked in
first place among U.S. orchestras by a jury of critics based in London, New
York, Los Angeles, Vienna, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam, Beijing and Seoul
writing in Gramophone Magazine, a U.K. classical music journal founded in
1923. In connection with the Gramophone ranking, world-renowned pianist
Emanuel Ax called the Musicians "capable of pretty much anything." In
February 2011, the Musicians earned their 61st and 62nd Grammy Awards, more
than any other group in Grammy history, for their recording of Verdi's
Requiem Mass with their music director, Maestro Riccardo Muti. In February
2011, the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra also performed at
Davies Hall in San Francisco as part of a year-long survey of the top
orchestras in the United States hosted by the San Francisco Symphony in
celebration of its centennial. The San Francisco Chronicle hailed the
Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra as "the most powerful and
unforgettable showing in this series" and the project's "crowning glory."
The Musicians, wrote the Chronicle, displayed an "ensemble virtuosity, tonal
luster and interpretive depth that none of the other orchestras could
match."

In April 2012, the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra performed in
Moscow and St. Petersburg, Russia, at the invitation of the Obama-Medvedev
Bilateral Presidential Commission. The concerts were the centerpiece of a
year-long cultural festival hosted by the U.S. Department of State and the
Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, and were the first
performances in Russia by a Big Five U.S. orchestra since the fall of
communism. With this tour, the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra
continued their long tradition of serving as ambassadors to the world on
behalf of the City of Chicago, having carried the city's banner and
performed concerts on five continents worldwide. The Musicians are
scheduled to inaugurate Carnegie Hall's 2012-2013 season at a gala
performance in New York City on October 3, 2012 and to make their first
appearances in Mexico in October 2012 and in South Korea in February 2013 as
part of the Musicians' 38th and 39th foreign tours.

"We are only asking management to agree to a pay package that is in line
with our industry peers and the CSOA's financial strength so that we can
maintain Chicago's competitive edge in symphonic music," said bassist
Stephen Lester, Chairman of the Musicians' committee that is negotiating
with management. "The Chicago Symphony Orchestra is a not-for-profit,
world-class cultural organization. Our product is our artistic quality.
Reducing costs by lowering Musician salaries beyond a certain level could
result in a flight of quality to other orchestras, which undercuts exactly
what the Chicago Symphony Orchestra seeks to sell in Chicago and around the
world," said Lester.
"It would be tantamount to the Art Institute's selling its Picassos and
Monets to buy lower quality works that are less expensive to maintain.
Unlike a business corporation, a cultural organization like the Chicago
Symphony Orchestra cannot save its way to success."

In its expired contract with management, the Musicians of the Chicago
Symphony Orchestra agreed to a 2.5% salary cut during two years. In the
negotiation of the current contract, the Musicians agreed to a number of
significant concessions, including a relaxation in conditions for
appearances away from Orchestra Hall but within the Chicago region,
addressing the CSOA's concern for new fundraising in the area; a new ticket
revenue opportunity in the form of admission to open rehearsals; a freeze in
Musician compensation for certain community concerts; an increase in the
number of rehearsals and concerts per week during the summer season; and an
increase in the number of rehearsals on tour.

The negotiations of the proposed contract began last summer. Following weeks
of discussions, the Musicians agreed to continue to work after their
contract expired on September 16 and until the end of the Musicians' Free
Concert for Chicago at Millennium Park on Friday evening, September 21, at
which the Musicians performed Carl Orff's Carmina Burana under Maestro Muti.
In good faith, the Musicians extended their Friday after-concert deadline
and agreed to continue to talk into Saturday, hopeful that they would reach
an agreement with management before Saturday evening's concert at Orchestra
Hall.
However, after delaying the pace of negotiation throughout the day, the
CSOA's attorney made an offer at approximately 6:00 pm on Saturday evening
that represented an increase of twenty dollars ($20.00) in total
compensation per Musician over the contract term compared to the last offer
presented. As a result, the Musicians concluded that management was not
negotiating in good faith and felt compelled to call a work stoppage.

"We were more unhappy than anyone about the cancellation of our Saturday
concert," said bassoonist William Buchman, Secretary of the Musicians'
negotiating committee, "and we couldn't understand why the CSOA and its
attorney slowed the pace of negotiation in a way that resulted in
inconvenience to our patrons. We are musicians; we are most comfortable on
the stage, not in a contract dispute or on a picket line. We live for the
opportunity to bring classical music to our audiences in Chicago and
abroad." "In all honesty," added Buchman, "the timing, tone and substance
of management's last offer to us on Saturday night shocked all of us, and in
light of the previous extensions of our deadline, we felt justified in
withholding our services."

The Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra were also disappointed to
learn of a number of misleading statements cited by the CSOA in its
communications with the public since the work stoppage began. For example,
the CSOA cited an average annual pay figure for Musicians that includes the
salaries of a group of approximately twelve Musicians who hold titled and
principal chairs and whose salary is significantly above the mean annual
Musician pay. Including the salaries of these Musicians misleadingly skews
the average annual pay figure upward given that the compensation of the vast
majority of the Musicians of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra is much lower.

The CSOA's public statements also describe various benefits out of context,
including paid time off, a pension plan, health insurance and personnel
size, without pointing out that these benefits are industry standards
provided by all of the Chicago Symphony's peer orchestras.
"What we do," said violinist Rachel Goldstein, the Musicians of the Chicago
Symphony Orchestra's representative at the American Federation of Musicians,
"is very physical and, in many ways, similar to playing a sport. If
Musicians are not given adequate time off during the year, we suffer
repetitive stress and other injuries." "Management has recognized this in
the past and previously agreed to working conditions that successfully
lowered the injury rate among Musicians,"
Goldstein added. "We do not understand why management is pointing to this
fact of life in a way that suggests that we are being unreasonable."

The CSOA also reported that the Musicians currently shoulder only 5% of the
cost of the health care provided to them, and that the proposals presented
by management would increase that share to 12%.
These numbers do not reflect the additional costs of deductibles, co-pays on
prescription drugs and office visits and procedures that are covered at less
than 100%. When these are factored in, the Musicians are currently carrying
approximately 10% of their health care costs. The Musicians are keenly
aware of the upward pressure on health care costs, and in these
negotiations, they have shown willingness to contribute significantly more
toward those costs. Under the Musicians' latest proposal, their share would
have climbed to over 20% of the total costs in the first year of a new
contract, with increases in that contribution that would have increased the
amount of dollars in anticipation of rising costs.

Furthermore, data provided to the Musicians by the CSOA shows a modest
increase of only $100,000 in total annual Musician health insurance costs
over the last ten years, an average increase of approximately 0.6% per year.
Coming changes in the health insurance market prompted by recently enacted
health care legislation are designed to keep costs from rising as
dramatically in the future, and may even bring costs down. In this light,
the 8.5% projected annual increase in health care costs that the CSOA has
used to justify its concerns seems out of line with the recent past and can
only be viewed as a desire to shift the burden of other expenses to the
Musicians.

"This is about the future of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. Is the CSOA
committed to keeping Chicago at the top of symphonic music-making in the
United States, or are they willing to let the wrong agents at the
negotiating table lead to a loss of artistic integrity?" Lester asked. "We
wake up every morning with the goal of making music in a way that preserves
the Chicago Symphony's legacy, and we will always remain committed to that
goal-throughout this negotiation and after it's over," said Lester. "We
want to be reasonable and to address management's concerns. After all,
assuring the long-term fiscal viability of our great orchestra and helping
to preserve the position of financial strength that it currently enjoys is
our goal, too. We look forward to continuing to work with our leaders in
management to come to a mutually acceptable agreement and to get back to the
stage and in front of our loyal patrons, where we belong."

* * *

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:27 am
by Michael Bush
Well, they made their move anyway. It's going to be interesting to see how their ticket buyers and donors respond.

Re: Chicago Strike

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:00 pm
by Alex C
Has this been posted?
Deal reached in CSO strike
Contract must be ratified, but shows expected to go on
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012 ... -committee