Page 1 of 1

Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:55 am
by Jerryleejr
Just curious I've seen some CC tubas with BBb slide kits. Obviously if they sounded as well as a dedicated BBb I would think a lot of guys n gals would go this route instead of having two horns. From a non-professional amateur player stand point anyone had good bad or ugly experience?

JJ

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:02 pm
by The Big Ben
Jerryleejr wrote:Just curious I've seen some CC tubas with BBb slide kits. Obviously if they sounded as well as a dedicated BBb I would think a lot of guys n gals would go this route instead of having two horns. From a non-professional amateur player stand point anyone had good bad or ugly experience?
At one time, Miraphone supplied BBb slides for use with their CC 186. Tuba Tinker has the description of one on his site and an analysis of how he felt it worked:

http://www.thevillagetinker.com/projects.htm" target="_blank

Scroll down the page. It is pretty far down but it is still there.

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:20 pm
by Jerryleejr
The Big Ben wrote:
Jerryleejr wrote:Just curious I've seen some CC tubas with BBb slide kits. Obviously if they sounded as well as a dedicated BBb I would think a lot of guys n gals would go this route instead of having two horns. From a non-professional amateur player stand point anyone had good bad or ugly experience?
At one time, Miraphone supplied BBb slides for use with their CC 186. Tuba Tinker has the description of one on his site and an analysis of how he felt it worked:

http://www.thevillagetinker.com/projects.htm" target="_blank" target="_blank

Scroll down the page. It is pretty far down but it is still there.
The fact he sold the horn may be a clue lol...

JJ

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:27 pm
by J.c. Sherman
An older Alex 164 at my alma mater - since stolen - had a BBb crook. because it was tapered throughout, that tuba was every bit as good in BBb as in CC.

An older Yamaha rotary CC I worked on had a reversible 5th for BBb. It was very decent in BBb, but a damn good CC. In BBb, though, you had an ascending 5th valve which offered nice options.

Every other conversion I've played played substantially better in CC.

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:50 pm
by Roger Lewis
Two words. Rotary Neptune.

Roger

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:59 pm
by Jerryleejr
Roger Lewis wrote:Two words. Rotary Neptune.

Roger
Lol roger that's why I posed the question....

JJ

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:22 pm
by captbill
My CB50 played very well as a BBb, but was great as a CC.
There was not a lot of difference, but a difference none the less. Just a hair stuffy as a BBb.
To be truly effective as a BBb you would need to slightly adjust all the valves' tuning slides very slightly and keep the rotor engaged. As a CC the horn was a little freer and the rotor could be used for the occasional alternate fingering.

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:53 am
by swillafew
Don't go there :tuba:

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:55 am
by opus37
Don't the travel tubas sold by Mack Brass and Wessex have slides for both F and Eb? I understand these are basically an F tuba, but how are they when played with the Eb slides?

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:36 am
by 2GBTG
Although I've never played a conversion tuba of any type, from what I've seen about the mini tubas they tend to play stuffy.viewtopic.php?f=9&t=56992

Also, mini BBb. Excited to give that a try.

Kitch

Re: Sound quality of conversion kits?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:35 am
by J.c. Sherman
Oooo! Wessex Tornister!