THe yamaha 641 and the yamaha 642 euphoniums

jameseuph642 · Post by **jameseuph642** » Thu Feb 24, 2005 11:22 pm

The 641 is Yamaha's original compensating euphonium, which was discoutinued in 1995. The 642 came out in 1996. The main difference between the two models is the bell and leadpipe along with a few cosmetic changes. The 641 as a one-piece 11'' bell and the leadpipe has a different taper and its is in a different location. The 642 has an 11 4/5" two-piece bell. Both models are excellent instruments.

elimia · Post by **elimia** » Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:29 am

The bigger bell on the 642 is supposed to lead to a fuller, albeit broader, sound. Some folks like the 641 better as the smaller bell provides more center to the sound; others like the 642 for the opposite reason.

The 642 has an arched handrest, whereas the 641 has a flat one. I play a 641 and don't have a problem with it. I think the sound is pretty typical Yamaha, dark and in tune. It plays a little sharp on some of the upper notes in the 3rd octave, but nothing that can't be adjusted with the embouchere.

Rick F · Post by **Rick F** » Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:51 am

Another difference (that Klaus would point out) is that the 641 has a one-piece bell construction. Some view this as a plus, but others say that working the metal of a bell out that far makes it thinner near the rim. I play on a 641 and like the horn very much. But I've also played on a friend's 642 and I think it responds better... especially in the low register.