Estimating dent repairs: mid bow, valve tubing
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 4:01 pm
A couple tubas I'm looking at are rough but the biggies are good: the bell is intact and the valves allegedly have compression. I'm trying to get a good idea of what the limits of supermagnet dent removal, and what it costs. Dents in lead pipe are intolerable, in valve tubing very unwanted...basically the further you go the less it matters, is my thinking.
If there are dents in the 4th valve tubing, is it an easy job to have a tech run magnetic balls through it, and at least keep it nice and open? How near a joint can you get without him having to unsolder and making a big deal out of it?
What if one of the middle bows is rough, is that harder because it is conical? I'm not sure the technical term, but I'm counting forward from the bottom bow and it's the third bow that is fairly well chewed up. I would be going for an 80% solution, opening it up but nothing like a restoration. Say there's 12 inches of tuba that are 60% mangled, in the third bow as I call it. What might it cost to iron out some valve tubing and a bow?
If there are dents in the 4th valve tubing, is it an easy job to have a tech run magnetic balls through it, and at least keep it nice and open? How near a joint can you get without him having to unsolder and making a big deal out of it?
What if one of the middle bows is rough, is that harder because it is conical? I'm not sure the technical term, but I'm counting forward from the bottom bow and it's the third bow that is fairly well chewed up. I would be going for an 80% solution, opening it up but nothing like a restoration. Say there's 12 inches of tuba that are 60% mangled, in the third bow as I call it. What might it cost to iron out some valve tubing and a bow?
