compare and contrast YFB-621/821 and Meinl-Weston 2182
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 2:37 am
I'm curious about both the YFB-621/821 and Meinl-Weston 2182 F tubas. I have played each. I am not in the market for either at this time, just researching for my own information.
They are both smaller F tubas which are easy to play. They are in the ballpark of the same size. I understand that the 2182 is a bit larger in the bell and valves and has a darker sound. The 2182 uses basically the same bell as an Alexander 155 F tuba. I'm really interested in the pitch problems with each. The Yamaha's issues (sharp first space A and Ab and flat fifth partial) seem to be well discussed on tubenet. The 2182's pitch issues don't seem widely discussed. The only 2182 I played was in 2007 at the meinl-weston factory. It was raw brass. I recall that it had a very very flat fifth partial, but I recall little beyond that. I've read that they all don't have that problem. Was that one a prototype? Are the production ones better in that regard? Do either of these models have a useable fifth partial? Is the open C in the staff sharp on either of these models? Is there any other F tuba approximately the size as these which compares favorably? If anyone has first hand knowledge of these models but doesn't want to post, but is willing to discuss via PM, I'd appreciate it much.
Thanks,
Christian
They are both smaller F tubas which are easy to play. They are in the ballpark of the same size. I understand that the 2182 is a bit larger in the bell and valves and has a darker sound. The 2182 uses basically the same bell as an Alexander 155 F tuba. I'm really interested in the pitch problems with each. The Yamaha's issues (sharp first space A and Ab and flat fifth partial) seem to be well discussed on tubenet. The 2182's pitch issues don't seem widely discussed. The only 2182 I played was in 2007 at the meinl-weston factory. It was raw brass. I recall that it had a very very flat fifth partial, but I recall little beyond that. I've read that they all don't have that problem. Was that one a prototype? Are the production ones better in that regard? Do either of these models have a useable fifth partial? Is the open C in the staff sharp on either of these models? Is there any other F tuba approximately the size as these which compares favorably? If anyone has first hand knowledge of these models but doesn't want to post, but is willing to discuss via PM, I'd appreciate it much.
Thanks,
Christian