Ill-fitting Cronkhite tuba bag
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:09 pm
One month ago I got my brand new Cronkhite leather tuba bag, made to fit a Besson 981 E-flat.
First of all - the bag looks great and the craftmanship is second to none. Overall a very good looking bag. Can't praise the quality enough.
I've not been able to try the bag with a tuba inside since I got it, until now. Just came home from the UK with my new Besson 981 (or old rather, hand picked by John Fletcher himself).
The bag has a tight fit around the bell, but that makes sense. The leather will give after some months of use.
My issue is that the bag just seems too big around the bottom bow. It fits length wise, but there is enough room depth wise to fit the girth of my 5/4 CC inside. With the bag closed, I can compress the area around the bottom bow with at least 5 cm, if not more. Surely the tuba cannot move inside since it's lodged between the bell and bottom bow, but apart from that there is lots of air around the instrument.
The other thing is that it seems like my bag is made for a rotary valve horn. I need to put the horn valves down in order to make sense of the padding when closing the bag. That probably how it should be?
All the rave about his bags here on TubeNet and elsewhere made me want a Cronkhite bag. But my initial impression with regards to fit is not as good as I'd like. I borrowed an instrument with an old Reunion Blues bag, from the time Glenn where there, and that is the best bag I've ever used. I would expect the fit of the new side loader to be at least equal to the old design.
This bag comes with a hefty price tag here in Norway. After tax I paid $950 for it, so I desperately want to enjoy it.
Did I get my expectations wrong? Is there that much free space inside by design?
All the best,
Knut
First of all - the bag looks great and the craftmanship is second to none. Overall a very good looking bag. Can't praise the quality enough.
I've not been able to try the bag with a tuba inside since I got it, until now. Just came home from the UK with my new Besson 981 (or old rather, hand picked by John Fletcher himself).
The bag has a tight fit around the bell, but that makes sense. The leather will give after some months of use.
My issue is that the bag just seems too big around the bottom bow. It fits length wise, but there is enough room depth wise to fit the girth of my 5/4 CC inside. With the bag closed, I can compress the area around the bottom bow with at least 5 cm, if not more. Surely the tuba cannot move inside since it's lodged between the bell and bottom bow, but apart from that there is lots of air around the instrument.
The other thing is that it seems like my bag is made for a rotary valve horn. I need to put the horn valves down in order to make sense of the padding when closing the bag. That probably how it should be?
All the rave about his bags here on TubeNet and elsewhere made me want a Cronkhite bag. But my initial impression with regards to fit is not as good as I'd like. I borrowed an instrument with an old Reunion Blues bag, from the time Glenn where there, and that is the best bag I've ever used. I would expect the fit of the new side loader to be at least equal to the old design.
This bag comes with a hefty price tag here in Norway. After tax I paid $950 for it, so I desperately want to enjoy it.
Did I get my expectations wrong? Is there that much free space inside by design?
All the best,
Knut