Onec again, mouthpeice question

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Tom
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:01 am

Post by Tom »

I screwed around with lots of different mouthpieces before really understanding that all I needed to do was pick one and go practice.

Thus, that's what I'd recommend
User avatar
Benjamin
bugler
bugler
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: Dublin VA
Contact:

Post by Benjamin »

I own 2 Con 25 and I own 1 PT-48. My PT-48 came with my Tuba. When I first got it I hated it. But like the man above me in this post said if you pick one and practice you'll get good. I think the PT-48 is real good mouthpiece. But it all depends on you. By they way them PT ones ain't cheap, all the ones I seen were about $100.
Benjamin.
User avatar
WoodSheddin
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: On the bike
Contact:

Post by WoodSheddin »

if ya don't sound good on it after a couple of days then send it back
sean chisham
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

Tubachris,

here´s what happened to ME:
- played MW 46 F-tuba with 24AW mouthpiece. Figured sound to be OK in mid- and low ranges and blamed sound issues in high register on my personal limits. (sound tends to "bottleneck" above c1, f1 won´t always work)
- bought B&S 4097 rotary CC-tuba (equals PT20), chose PT50+ mouthpiece to go with it. And WHAM!! greatly decreased sound issues at ALL registers, including an increase in range on the upper end. Hardly any bottlenecking involved here.
- tried PT50+ on F-tuba and had broader sound all over, but the high range issues remained.

My point is:
-you, the horn and the mouthpiece form a team of three that must (or let´s say, WANT TO) work together.
-As long as none of those three have obvious flaws, (on a MP: no chewing gum or hamburgers sticking in the cup!!) you´ll be fine.
-The flaws of one in the team are VERY hard if not impossible to compensate by the other two. (Fight the cause, not the symptom)
-the work you put in as YOUR part of that team of three has the greatest effect on your performance, so that´s always where I start trying to improve.
- don´t be fooled by instant improvement with a new mouthpiece. That may be the effect of sudden difference. Wait several hours of practising before you switch.
Have fun
Hans

BTW, how´s that circular breathing coming ?
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
User avatar
phoenix
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 363
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 9:27 pm
Location: Lansdale, PA

Post by phoenix »

A Laskey 30H works just fine with me on my Miraphone 1291, but it's up to you man. No one here knows what you would sound best on. I hear the stainless steel mouthpieces are worth a shot though. Keep trying different ones and see what you like more and try to actually get to some kind of music store so you can sit down and try likr ten mouthpieces at a time.
Mitch
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:29 am
Location: Chicago

mouthpiece

Post by Mitch »

Tubachris,

Before you spend too much money, wait a minute. It's important to keep in mind that the mouthpiece and the horn, in a way, have NOTHING to do with your sound. They are merely an extension of what you physically do to manifest sound. Looking for a magic mouthpiece that will take care of register and timbre issues will be an unfulfilling life-long search.
Find a mouthpiece that's comfortable on your face. That's it. The rest you should be able to do with your embouchure and air. Range, to speak simply, is merely a function of aperture and air speed. It IS that easy. A large aperture and slow air will produce a low note. A small aperture and fast air will produce a high note. The quantity of air will determine volume. It IS that simple.
If you want the secret to a solid range, send me a private message. It is ridiculously simple.
As for the mouthpiece, I would wager it's 10% of the issue, at most. It only amplifies what you're buzzing. In theory, at least, you should be the same player on any mouthpiece. If you're truly an efficient tubist, the mouthpiece should only be affecting the subtlest changes in timbre.
User avatar
JayW
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:18 am
Location: Northern NJ aka NYC suburb
Contact:

Post by JayW »

Two thumbs up to Mitch!!!!!!!
Jay
proud new owner of a kick arse Eastman 632
Photographer
Dog Lover
Hiker
winston
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Post by winston »

.
Last edited by winston on Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Winston Hind
The Naden Band of the Royal Canadian Navy
User avatar
manatee
bugler
bugler
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:06 am
Location: Oregon

Post by manatee »

I disagree with all those who say the mouthpiece selection doesn't matter.
If you go to a good hardware store, there are many hammers. All of them do basically the same thing, but they are different. Which one will HELP you build a better house? Which one will make the job easier?
Maybe because you have practiced, you will know.
Maybe like many of us, you will end up collecting hammers. :oops:
User avatar
elimia
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Hermitage, Tennessee

Post by elimia »

I tended to look for a mouthpiece that will produce a characteristic sound for the instrument. Then I stick with it and work on the more important parts of making music, namely air volume and control. Rather than buy a bunch of mpcs as the sound fix, I bought a $6 Voldyne spirometer to build endurance and air volume.

Amazingingly, the mpc I was initially sure was just too big to play high on wasn't the issue, nor was the embouchere really. It was the air. I identified my largest obstacle to just be the 'thickness' of the air column. Once I figured that out I've been a much better player. The embouchere wasn't a real problem anymore and the sound and endurance are much improved. I even sound nice in the high register on a pretty big mpc (for me at least).

On euphonium I look at the big ol' SM3 mpc Steven Mead plays. That mpc has been known to be overwhelming to some players. You think he gets that sound because of the mpc?

Mpcs - don't get so hung up on them! IMO work on a less gear oriented and more mundane approach - air column.
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Post by MaryAnn »

It's six of one and a half dozen of the other.

When I was in my early years with the horn (i.e. from about 10 years ago to about 5 years ago) I went though mouthpieces like crazy. Every time I changed I could hear a huge difference in my sound for about a week, and then it went back to where I was before. Sometimes a new cup would make the high range easier, or the low range easier, but always after about a week I was back where I started. I stil have most of the cigar box full of them, too.

Then finally my embouchure and technique solidified to the point where my range and sound had only barely perceptible differences no matter what mouthpiece I played on. Hmmmm.

Then....I found a cup that obviously locked in the notes on my horn better over the entire range, and the sound also had somewhat more focus. Subtle but there. Later I found a rim that increased my endurance; didn't affect the sound noticibly but suddenly I could play longer. It took a couple weeks to adjust to the different way I had to articulate but it worked.

I have stayed with that rim and cup and will continue to do so. I sound pretty much the same on every mouthpiece I own now, but the current combination is easier to play on. There is no way I would have or could have noticed these subtle effects during the first five years I was playing horn.

On tuba I use a fairly low volume cup because I am so small, and it works.

MA
User avatar
jmh3412
bugler
bugler
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:38 am
Location: England

Mike Finn

Post by jmh3412 »

After many years playing on Wick 2L, just tried Mike Finn mouthpieces. A revelation - if you can get over the looks well worth a try.
Composers shouldn't think too much -- it interferes with their plagiarism.
Post Reply