Eb vs F

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
pjv
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 879
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:39 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by pjv »

E tuba? (the "guitar friendly" tuba)
marccromme
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:42 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Eb vs F

Post by marccromme »

Jim Brewer wrote:Fair question. Quintet work mostly, even though I could play quintet well with my MW CC. 100% of my playing is band, with the old orchestra transcriptions with a half million flats. The tuba section has 3 Bbs, an Eb, and 2 Cs.
I do love the way the Eb fits in. It's agile, great tone, and killer pedals tones. My C does well but stuffy under low G.

If I had to say, it's more of a preference at this point to have the option to play a smaller horn.
I think you are answering your own question: Eb fits well with band with many flats and quintet work. And if you want a more singing tonal quality, don't go for a standard brass band 48cm 19 inch bell 3+1 compensated horn, look for a 17inch or 42cm bell, I would say a 5 valve with easy accessible trigger slide on 4th or 5th, or a 3+1 compensated horn are equally fine if good quality.

Check out the 17inch bell Besson (top or front action), the Meinl-Weston 2142 or 2024/5, the Miraphone Nordic Star, or the Willson 3400, just to name a few from the top of my head. And report back what you like about these ...
Yamaha YEB-321 Eb 4v TA tuba
Meinl-Weston 2141 Eb 5v FA tuba
Hirsbrunner Bb 3v TA compensated euph
Wessex Dolce Bb 3+1v TA compensated euph
Alto/tenor/bass trombones in various sizes/plugs
barry grrr-ero
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:40 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by barry grrr-ero »

I more or less grew up on Besson tubas, so I've never felt that compensating tubas were all that stuffy. I guess that's a bit like those who say they can work around a 'wonky' low C on an F tuba. For me, the only low note that felt and sounded stuffy on a 3 +1 compensating Eb is - of course! - low E natural (all four valves depressed). My front action 983 had a rock solid low F. I only sold that tuba because my right hand couldn't deal with the long pistons any longer. However, the 3 + 1 style is less challenging in that regard since the fourth valve is in left hand.

Shorter version: if the 3 + 1 style compensating Eb interests you, I wouldn't worry about stuffy low notes unless you need to belt out loud low E naturals all day long.

p.s. I've used compensating eefers at Oktoberfests where I had to play lots of low F's, and never had any trouble doing that. We were on mikes, so using a larger tuba wasn't necessary. The old Bessons have a sweet sound that few F tubas can duplicate, but F tubas - naturally enough - offer a bit more agility. I know that much from just trying them out.
marccromme
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:42 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Eb vs F

Post by marccromme »

bloke wrote:The low E is going to be particularly "stuffy" on a comp-Eb because the compensating system completely "runs out of gas" at that point; the low E is horribly sharp. Much of the experienced "stuffiness" is (in reality, simply) "not enough tubing"..
Here is m solution: I play a 5v FA Eb (all valves right hand) tuba where I easily can manipulate the 4th slide trigger with my left hand.
Pulling the right amount between 0 and 8 cm brings every valve combination in the contra octave into tune, right down to the pedals.

Bb (4) - A (235)- Ab (45) - G (234) - Gb (345- F (2345)- E (12345) and (pedal) Eb all fine in tune. Off course, resistance increases down to E and decreases on shift to pedal Eb, going from maximal tubing length to minimal length, but that is expected.

And I don't loose a perfectly in-tune E with 235 (or 24 plus 3cm pull), or F (4 no pull).
Yamaha YEB-321 Eb 4v TA tuba
Meinl-Weston 2141 Eb 5v FA tuba
Hirsbrunner Bb 3v TA compensated euph
Wessex Dolce Bb 3+1v TA compensated euph
Alto/tenor/bass trombones in various sizes/plugs
barry grrr-ero
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:40 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by barry grrr-ero »

Bloke, that's brilliant. I'll remember that if I ever go back to a compensating eefer. I had a throw rod for the main slide, so I would push all the way out for those bottom notes. As a result, the F was pretty good and the E still somewhat sharp. I played with the third valve slide pulled out a good distance.
Patrase
bugler
bugler
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Patrase »

I second (or third) getting a smaller than 19 inch bell Eb tuba. If you buy an old Besson one budget for a valve rebuild and put rubber dampers and Yamaha springs in it. Also experiment with alternate fingering in the upper register. The PT84 mouthpiece works well Bessons and fits older Bessons if you order the XS shank. Wessex have a solo model and Yamaha had one as well. Bloke had a Willson one too at some point. Don't get a non compensated 4 valve Eb.

The piston 5 valve Eb tubas are awesome. Super easy low range and much easier to jump between registers. But they are harder to find second hand. Also harder to play than 3+1 Eb if join a brass band.

I would only consider F if you are going to play solos or orchestral parts
Miraphone Norwegian Star
Yamaha YBB-632 Bb Neo
Phil Dawson
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 302
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Livingston MT

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Phil Dawson »

I have a Miraphone 1293 CC, a Connn 3J CC, and a Besson 983 E flat all in silver. I play all of them regularly and love them all - just in different ways. the easiest to play is probably the 1293. Phil
User avatar
Ltrain
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:58 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Ltrain »

Patrase wrote:Also harder to play than 3+1 Eb if join a brass band.

I would only consider F if you are going to play solos or orchestral parts
????????? - to both points quoted above.
Eastman 853 Eb ("Edith")
1963 King 1250 Sousaphone ("Jackie O")
Aguilar Amplification
--------------
Founder, L Train Brass Band
Patrase
bugler
bugler
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Patrase »

Re the above:

I have owned/played 3+1 Eb, 5 valve Eb and 5 valve F.

In brass band music, particularly the higher level pieces, the parts are so technical that 3+1 makes the fast technical passages that much easier to play.

Regarding F tuba I found that, compared to Eb, the well known bass tuba orchestral excerpts (eg Symphonie Fantastique) and solos (Vaughn Williams, Penderecki Capriccio), to name but a few, seemed easier on F.
Miraphone Norwegian Star
Yamaha YBB-632 Bb Neo
User avatar
PaulMaybery
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:10 am
Location: Prior Lake, Minnesota

Re: Eb vs F

Post by PaulMaybery »

I believe that in listening to a great Eb player, say like John Fletcher in all of those PJBE recordings and his recording of the VW will demonstrate, rather convincingly, that the Eb Besson with the large bell works just fine. I used one for about 10 years when I served as Divisional Music Director for The Salvation Army. Mine had a larger lead pipe and thus tended to sound a bit darker than John's, but it got around remarkably well and with a gorgeous buttery sound. I did play it mostly in treble clef, and while I did use it in several orchestra performances and standard quintet gigs, I never quite felt that I mastered the fingerings. So I eventually went back to my tubas of 40 years, the good ol' F and CC. Sometimes I think had I first learned the Eb tuba, life may have been a bit better as I believe that accoustically it is perhaps the most perfect of all the keys for a tuba. But like most Americans, I began on BBb, switched to CC in grad school and then the F when I eventually became a professional free lancer. Funny, even after having put the BBb down around 40 years ago, when I do pick it up, it instinctively feels the most natural in my hands. But I have lost the touch on it so, I'm not going back. I never found the compensation system "stuffy". Yes there seemed to be a bit more resistance to a Besson, but much of that I attribute to the heavier gauge of the metal. Besson makes a non compensation series of low brasses, and we had several in the SA. Other than not being compensating, they still had that characteristic Besson feel to them. I rather enjoyed that resistant timber. For me it tended to improve the focus of the notes and made it more dificult to distort the sound when playing in extremely loud passages.
Wessex 5/4 CC "Wyvern"
Wessex 4/4 F "Berg"
Wessex Cimbasso F
Mack Euphonium
Mack Bass Trombone
Conn 5V Double Bell Euphonium (casually for sale to an interested party)
hup_d_dup
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:10 am
Location: Tewksbury, NJ

Re: Eb vs F

Post by hup_d_dup »

3 days ago I played the Blazhevich No. 5 as an audition piece, on a Besson compensating Eb. On this horn, the study goes down to a 4 valve low E.

I had the option to play this audition on a Bb, and admittedly, my significantly larger Bb has a greater presence on the low E. But I chose to perform on the Eb for other reasons, and because the low E on the smaller horn is still a respectively solid note.

Hup
Do you really need Facebook?
User avatar
Ltrain
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:58 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Ltrain »

I'm wondering if anyone can give me an apples to apples comparison of two similarly-priced and spec'd offerings from Wessex: Berg (F) vs Danube (Eb)

Let's say "a friend of mine" was considering owning his first bass tuba and $3K was his hard budget (because his wife would undoubtedly make him fund this purchase by selling some of his more "aspirational" boutique electric bass gear). Goals/rational for this purchase include literature (VW, etc) and having a smaller horn to schlep across NYC for small ensemble meet-ups where the bigger horn can get a little unwieldy.

This friend also plays CC tuba and dabbled in F in college (forever ago), making the F seem like the more logical choice considering how mixing different fingerings tend to break his brain. But I—I mean he—is known to throw logic to the wind and has the crazy notion that Eb tubas are cool, mystical, versatile, and capable of channeling a certain Norwegian spirit animal.

All things considered, which of these two Wessex(s?) does the tubenet hive mind favor?
Eastman 853 Eb ("Edith")
1963 King 1250 Sousaphone ("Jackie O")
Aguilar Amplification
--------------
Founder, L Train Brass Band
marccromme
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:42 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Eb vs F

Post by marccromme »

BrooklynBass wrote:I'm wondering if anyone can give me an apples to apples comparison of two similarly-priced and spec'd offerings from Wessex: Berg (F) vs Danube (Eb)
I can't offer you a comparision, as I never played the Berg, but I find the Danube a fine 5v rotary Eb instrument with good value for the price, you can find my description and comments here on the tubenet.
Yamaha YEB-321 Eb 4v TA tuba
Meinl-Weston 2141 Eb 5v FA tuba
Hirsbrunner Bb 3v TA compensated euph
Wessex Dolce Bb 3+1v TA compensated euph
Alto/tenor/bass trombones in various sizes/plugs
Patrase
bugler
bugler
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:02 pm

Re: Eb vs F

Post by Patrase »

I'm wondering if anyone can give me an apples to apples comparison of two similarly-priced and spec'd offerings from Wessex: Berg (F) vs Danube (Eb)
I am a reseller of Wessex in Australia and have played both back to back. I prefer the ergonomics of the Danube. Sound wise they are quite similar in sound. A tuba player will notice a very slight difference in that the Berg seems slightly smaller than the Danube - but I doubt a listener would notice. I have found the intonation on the Berg better than the Danube, based on the ones I have tried. Having read enough of Bloke's posts I now place intonation as the highest priority when evaluating a new instrument. Then 'sound.'

If you like piston valves and can afford the higher price I would also suggest the Gnagey. They play very well. Mr Gnagey can be proud of that one.
Miraphone Norwegian Star
Yamaha YBB-632 Bb Neo
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8556
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: Eb vs F

Post by iiipopes »

And what is wrong with the CC in ensemble? The few times I played quintet, I played my 186 and just lightened my approach.
Jupiter JTU1110, RT-82.
"Real" Conn 36K.
Post Reply