Curiosity on Bach 18

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Sidanas
lurker
lurker
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:35 pm

Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Sidanas »

Hi Everybody, I've recently found a Bach 18 corporation New York, well it's really different from the modern 18...it's unbelievably larger, I thought it should have been smaller due to the age of manufacturing but I was mistaking, and it works better than the modern one. Anybody has little more info about that kind of Bach? Someone told me that they are quite rare..
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Donn »

For relevant Tubenet background on this, see for example Mouthpiece consistency. Yep, larger - or smaller, or deeper, or shallower ...
Sidanas
lurker
lurker
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:35 pm

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Sidanas »

It's larger in inner diameter, the depth is the same as modern.
User avatar
pjv
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 879
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:39 am

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by pjv »

I'm unfamiliar with their variations in mpc's as I only own one; my first mpc
Bought it in the '70's, haven't used it since.
I do have various sizes in tbn mpc's from various periods and they can differ quite a lot.
For example the N.Y.'s have a much shorter shank then the Mt.Vernon's (the period following).
It all comes down to if the mpc helps you to increase the efficiency with doing whatever it is you want to do.
Sidanas
lurker
lurker
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:35 pm

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Sidanas »

Stryk wrote:I have a few older Bach 18s. They each seem a little different and are NOT the same as the ones produced today.
It’s 34 mm diameter vs 32 of the modern 18. Could it be a special 18 made for request?
Mike C855B
bugler
bugler
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:23 pm

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Mike C855B »

Sidanas wrote:
Stryk wrote:I have a few older Bach 18s. They each seem a little different and are NOT the same as the ones produced today.
It’s 34 mm diameter vs 32 of the modern 18. Could it be a special 18 made for request?
Or maybe modified post-manufacture. I have a 40-year-old 18 on my 28J and it measures 1-1/4", or ~32mm.
Miraphone 191 4-valve
1925 Conn 28J
Cerveny CEP 531-4M
Fox 880 "Sayen" (oops... that's an oboe) ;)
WC8KCY
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:24 am

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by WC8KCY »

Sidanas wrote:
Stryk wrote:I have a few older Bach 18s. They each seem a little different and are NOT the same as the ones produced today.
It’s 34 mm diameter vs 32 of the modern 18. Could it be a special 18 made for request?
The first tuba 'piece I played on was a NY 18. When it was replaced with a new 18 (around 1982), I also noticed that the new 18 cup was narrower, and the inner rim more rounded, than the NY 18.

That NY 18 was a superb player. It really calmed down the squirrelly slotting of the early (and very mediocre) YBB-321 I used it on. Even with all the plating worn off of it, I kept it handy 'til I graduated from high school in 1987.
User avatar
Alex C
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:34 am
Location: Cybertexas

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Alex C »

Mouthpieces can change in size during production due to dulling of the cutting surfaces. While it is true that hardened steel cutting tools cut through brass like butter, the tools do wear and are shaprened (thus reducing the amount of brass removed as steel is filed away). How often they are re-shapened is anybody's guess.

I am most impressed with Terry Warburton's mouthpiece consistency. Computer directed cutting gets as close to consistent as it can be. When I watched, the cutting tool was recalibrated on every cut, the mouthpiece blank was set and measured by computer before cutting started. Very consistent.

Bach 18's were the standard for many decades but have fallen out of favor. I turned back to one as I got older and my sound seemed to brighten. The Bach 18 took the edge off and, with a little searching, I found a magic one. I have a New York 18 that is good and had Mr. Oberloh refinish it for me but that Elkhart 18 is stock in every way and pure magic.

It took me about 20 different Bach 18's to find magic but it made me happy for the last 5 years.
City Intonation Inspector - Dallas Texas
"Holding the Bordognian Fabric of the Universe together through better pitch, one note at a time."

Practicing results in increased atmospheric CO2 thus causing global warming.
Ace
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:46 am
Location: Berkeley, CA

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Ace »

To complicate matters, is the Faxx 18 (which I love) the same or similar to the Bach 18?

Ace
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by Donn »

Ace wrote:To complicate matters, is the Faxx 18 (which I love) the same or similar to the Bach 18?
How could it not be? I mean, from what I'm reading there, given enough Bach 18s, you're sure to find one that's just like your Faxx. The published dimensions are the same - 32.1mm inside diameter, 8.84mm throat (same as 24AW.) But, judging from my Faxx Hb based on the Conn 120, you might look for some small adjustments to the rim - the Hb's rim is not only unlike what I understand the Conn 120's has been in any era, it isn't like anything else I've seen either. It would be interesting to see what they do with the 18.
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: Curiosity on Bach 18

Post by GC »

I've heard comments that the Blessing 18 was the best Bach 18 ever made.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
Post Reply