steel tuba

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5676
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Years ago, Ren Schilke did a series of experiments using different bell materials for a trumpet. Here's a link to his lecture on the subject:

http://www.dallasmusic.org/schilke/Brass%20Clinic.html

That being said, I doubt that steel would make much of a difference from brass for the bell on a tuba. Some austenitic stainless alloys have better spinning properties than brass. I suppose if someone had the time, tooling and motivation, one could probably build a very striking looking tuba with large branches made from stainless. With a brushed finish, it might bear a family resemblence to my refrigerator... :)
Last edited by Chuck(G) on Sun May 08, 2005 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kevin Miller
bugler
bugler
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 6:33 am
Contact:

Post by Kevin Miller »

Steel Tuba? I'm guessing it would give you a tone with a Caribbean flavor and cause you to crave Red Stripe beer and cause an overwhelming desire to partake of the local herb. :lol:
Kevin Miller
Private Teacher/Freelancer
Tulsa Opera Orchestra
Bravo Brass
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11512
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Would this be in the same instrument family group as steel guitar? :lol:
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Art Hovey
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Connecticut

Post by Art Hovey »

Stainless steel would be better than brass because it is lighter and stronger, and does not corrode. But it would still dent easily. I think carbon fiber is the way to go for the larger bows and bell.
User avatar
Kevin Hendrick
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Location: Location

Post by Kevin Hendrick »

Art Hovey wrote:Stainless steel would be better than brass because it is lighter and stronger, and does not corrode. But it would still dent easily. I think carbon fiber is the way to go for the larger bows and bell.
How about carbon fiber rotors (or pistons, for that matter) -- any known minuses? (they'd certainly be light)

Silicon carbide also comes to mind for valve apps ... any thoughts?
"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5676
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Kevin Hendrick wrote:
Art Hovey wrote:Stainless steel would be better than brass because it is lighter and stronger, and does not corrode. But it would still dent easily. I think carbon fiber is the way to go for the larger bows and bell.
How about carbon fiber rotors (or pistons, for that matter) -- any known minuses? (they'd certainly be light)

Silicon carbide also comes to mind for valve apps ... any thoughts?
As varioius manufacturers (Hirsbrunner, Finke, etc.) found out, the fly in the ointment with non-brass rotors is the difference in coefficient of expansion between the rotor and the brass casing. If sufficiently dissimilar, you wind up with a choice between leaky valves or valves that jam in warm weather.

You could use a different material for the casing, but then you'd have the problem of how to provide a solderable surface to which to attach tubes.

There was a french horn made sometime ago that used aluminum rotors, but saliva reacts with aluminum--and you can guess the rest.

There's probably a combination of materials that will work well, but will it work sufficiently better than the current (brass) approach to justify the added cost and tooling?
Post Reply