Miraphone 187 vs 188

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by GC »

Since the 187 BBb and 188 CC are beefier versions of the 186, do they play similarly or is one noticeably better than the other?
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
Ken Crawford
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 722
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:45 am
Location: Rexburg, ID

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by Ken Crawford »

Well...BBb tubas are better. So the 187 is better than the 188.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11222
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by bort »

No sir... 188 = 187 + 1

:)
Tubaguyry
bugler
bugler
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 3:14 am

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by Tubaguyry »

The 188 has much less of a tendency to get that horrible, heinous, fingernails-on-a-chalkboard sound that the 186 gets (especially at higher volume levels.) The 188 is what the 186 wants to be when it grows up: it plays similarly to the 186, but with a more round, mellow tuba sound. Also, the 188 is far, far more comfortable to hold because of the way the tubing is wrapped.
Ryan Rhodes
Springfield, MO

Big Mouth Brass J-445LQ F
JinBao 600S F
1919 Holton Eb
1964 Olds O-97 BBb sousaphone

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by GC »

There are always tons of comments about the 188. It's one of the most popular and respected horns out there. The 187 gets almost no comments at all. The fact that there aren't a lot of comments could say it all, or say nothing. I was hoping for legit comments about the 187, but this IS TubeNet, after all.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
The Big Ben
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Port Townsend, WA

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by The Big Ben »

GC wrote:There are always tons of comments about the 188. It's one of the most popular and respected horns out there. The 187 gets almost no comments at all. The fact that there aren't a lot of comments could say it all, or say nothing. I was hoping for legit comments about the 187, but this IS TubeNet, after all.
My understanding is that a 187 is "a 186 with a bigger bell". True? Not true?
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by GC »

Schlepporello wrote:Ok, I like my 187 but I can't compare it to a 188 because I don't play CC. I'm a BBb kinda guy. I'm happy withe the horn and plan on keeping it. How's that?
It's reasonable, and thank you.
The Big Ben wrote:My understanding is that a 187 is "a 186 with a bigger bell". True? Not true?

Is that all the 188 is? A CC186 with a bigger bell? The 188 is considered by many to be superior to the 186, but is bell size the only difference? If that's all it takes, why does the 187 seem to get little respect?

I've seen a fair number of 188's over the years and have tried a few. They're excellent instruments. I guess my issue is that there are so few 187's around. I've never seen or played one. I'm curious why it seems to get less respect and doesn't seem to sell well.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
joh_tuba
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:34 pm

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by joh_tuba »

Pistons by design have a mechanically defined up and down motion and longer travel than a rotor. That combined with the clear tactile feedback at the top and bottom of the stroke *forces* better finger technique and more conscious coordination of your fingers.

Rotors, often with silicone bumpers and sloppy linkage, allow 'flat finger' technique and an 'air tuba' level of finger coordination.

For this reason, a 'typical' piston tuba is easier to 'play clean' than a typical rotary horn of similar quality.

When rotors are well adjusted that difference diminishes.
ckalaher1
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:35 am

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by ckalaher1 »

I noodled around on a 187 recently for the first time ever. Very, very nice tuba. Did everything I asked it to do.

I have no idea how they sound out front, but my assumption is that the 187 projects pretty nicely, just like the 188.

Anyhow, this example was 10 out of 10 with regards to pitch and playability.
User avatar
Roger Lewis
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1157
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:48 am

Re: Miraphone 187 vs 188

Post by Roger Lewis »

One thing to note about the 187 is that the flare begins 'way earlier, in the main tuning slide. You cannot reverse the main slide as there are two different sizes of pipe on it.

Roger
"The music business is a cruel and shallow trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." Hunter S Thompson
Post Reply