Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah Bookmark and Share

The bulk of the musical talk

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby PaulMaybery » Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:55 am

The Stofer Geib has been in and out of the Wyvern now for about a year. At first I gave it a straight shot for about 6 months. (I realize you mentioned the Monette - but I have to add it into the comparison) For a couple of simple reasons I did not end up with the S/G. That other (Prana 94) won my little comparison.
Accoustically I thought the S/D was sweet, capable of a huge warm sound, particularly on larger tubas.It was incredible on the Wessex York prototype.
I rather liked the smaller throat, and I really couldn't tell you beans about the length of the throat or back bore.
I felt the throat was balanced perfectly with the size of the cup to make it possible for it to accept a huge sound.
Volume was never an issue, nor was timbre or any aspect of the quality of sound.
My issue was with the rim. At first I found it extremely comfortable. It allowed for incredible sensitivity for the articulation/release of sound. I did not keep jumping back and forth for these first months. I wanted to know what this piece could do on its own. I believe when we swap back and forth after only a few minutes, what we experience for a large part is how the chops react to the previous MP.
To cut to the chase, for me the rim was a little narrow and sunk into the lip tissue a little too quickly when playing strenuous charts for extended periods. I also realize that the rim is one of the sweet features of this MP. Had I not had the Prana 94, I would still be playing the S/G. The S/G is a rather sophisticated piece, whatever that means.
I pulled it out last week for another go at it, and put it away after just 2 orchestra rehearsals.
It is strange that in the 1960s I had an original Conn Geib,($5,00) kept it for a few months and sold it back for $4.00.
Being a young player, I did not understand how to deal with the sharper rim and on graduation with a class of 500 (7 times throught Pomp and Circum...)worked myself a nice water blister on my upper lip. But that could have happened on the Conn 120.
On its own the S/G is a beautiful creation and a wonderful tool. I would recommend it, but it ain't cheap. $250 in gold.
Buy it and get used to it. Take the time without a bunch of yapping from others, and have it tell you what it needs.

On a sidebar, I am curious as to what the S/G might feel like in Lexan.
Wessex 5/4 CC "Wyvern"
Wessex 4/4 F "Berg"
Wessex Cimbasso F
Mack Euphonium
Mack Bass Trombone
Conn 5V Double Bell Euphonium (casually for sale to an interested party)
User avatar
PaulMaybery
pro musician
pro musician
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:10 am
Location: Prior Lake, Minnesota

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby Three Valves » Thu Jan 11, 2018 8:59 am

tubajazzo wrote: Found the stainless to be brighter and with "less bottom", but that may be just me....


Nobody liked "less bottom!!" :shock:
Who needs four valves??

Mack Brass Artiste
MackBrunner 210L
Bach 12
Kelly 18
User avatar
Three Valves
6 valves
6 valves
 
Posts: 2389
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:44 am
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby Casca Grossa » Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:54 am

Three Valves wrote:
tubajazzo wrote: Found the stainless to be brighter and with "less bottom", but that may be just me....


Nobody liked "less bottom!!" :shock:


I prefer a lot on top, less in the middle, and lots of bottom.
Mack-a-clone 186 "Chairman Mao"
Blokepiece Imperial #2 Fair Dinkum Profundo Rim
Why have 3 valves when you can have 6 and a main tuning slide kicker???
Casca Grossa
4 valves
4 valves
 
Posts: 606
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 8:36 am
Location: Reading, PA

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby bloke » Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:11 pm

Casca Grossa wrote:I prefer a lot on top, less in the middle, and lots of bottom.


pictures, please...or a video, if available( ...dancing to *La Cucaracha).

_____________________________________________________________________
*which, btw, is ALSO the name of a brand-new SQUARE-cup/SQUARE-rim mouthpiece fabricated entirely of unobtainium (not to be confused with upsidasium)...even though unobtainium seems to offer response problems on the 22nd - 28th partials (even #'s only)
User avatar
bloke
musician/technician/innovator
musician/technician/innovator
 
Posts: 38301
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby Dan Tuba » Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:05 pm

I really like KELLY Mouthpieces. I have used the Kellyberg on my sousaphone for both marching band and NOLA brass band. I have also used the Kellyberg on my Conn 25J tuba and the Kellyberg works well. I recently purchased a KELLY KT-50 and I think it’s great! For me, the KT-50 offers a similar feel and similar playing characteristics as the PT-50 mouthpiece. For my JP 3 + 1 EEb Tuba, the Kelly 24AW works very well. The Kelly 24AW is not the same as a Bach 24AW. Completely different rim...much thinner.

Why Kelly lexan Mouthpieces?
Well, let’s just say that I have sensitive skin and an underlying medical condition that flairs up from time to time that makes playing on silver plated, gold plated, stainless steel, lexan rimmed, and titanium Mouthpieces very uncomfortable. Yes, I have tried them all. :shock: Multiple Times... :(

Lexan vs Brass vs Stainless Steel vs Titanium?
Yes, in my opinion they offer their own unique tonal qualities. However, they all offer the ability to produce a good sound. With that said, I really think that the biggest differences in timbre, articulation, intonation, and efficiency are a result of the internal dimensions of the cup, throat/backbore, the shank/receiver relationship, and the rim shape. Ultimately, it’s what feels comfortable and enables the player to produce the desired sound, clarity, and intonation “out front” that really matters. I highly recommend recording yourself both individually and in an ensemble before you decide what works best. It’s not how clear and awesome you sound at your seat that matters, it’s how clear and awesome you sound in the audience seats that matters.
Conn 25J
JP 3+1 Compensating EEb
Kelly 24AW & KT-50
Dan Tuba
pro musician
pro musician
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:21 pm
Location: Waynesville, Missouri

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby Dubby » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:40 am

I keep Kellybergs in my car, gig bag, in the tuba room, and at home. They’re cheap enough to have multiple of and I don’t mind lending them out if someone forgot a mouthpiece or for pep band when it’s the end of October in South Dakota and we have snow.

Plus they draw attention and as a tubist, I crave attention. :tuba:

(I think we all know that the Glow-in-the-Dark is the one you really want :D )
King Frankenhorn 2341
Dubby
bugler
bugler
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby bloke » Sun Jan 14, 2018 11:57 am

Has anyone compared the glitter gold PT-24AW+ vs. the cerrobend PT-24AW+ ?
User avatar
bloke
musician/technician/innovator
musician/technician/innovator
 
Posts: 38301
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby Dan Tuba » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:10 pm

I haven’t tried the glitter gold 24AW. However, I have tried the Harvest Gold 24AW. The Harvest Gold 24AW enables the performer to exhibit a certain “earthiness” in their sound with a little “dirt” when the situation calls for such tonal qualities. Perhaps the Glitter Gold 24AW would enable the performer to produce a “pretty” sound with some “sparkles?”
Conn 25J
JP 3+1 Compensating EEb
Kelly 24AW & KT-50
Dan Tuba
pro musician
pro musician
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:21 pm
Location: Waynesville, Missouri

Re: Freak Jury Mouthpiece Blah-Blah

Postby bloke » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:39 pm

...I'm wondering how a Lexan mouthpiece with a whole bunch of extra mass would respond...

Realize that - rather than 1.2 oz - these could end up weighing nearly 2 oz. :shock:
User avatar
bloke
musician/technician/innovator
musician/technician/innovator
 
Posts: 38301
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: western Tennessee

Previous

Return to TubeNet

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: besson900, Bing [Bot], caseys186, sweaty, tubapix and 35 guests