Re: difference between "tenor tuba" and "euphonium" ?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:34 am
Some of the attributes you ascribe to European "tenor tubas" are also true of older Martin euphoniums. The old Martins were wrapped taller/wider than compensating euphoniums, had fatter bottom bows and outer branches, and narrower leadpipes. Martin would make these in any configuration you wanted--top action pistons (3v, 3+1 and 4 inline), front action pistons, and even with rotary valves (there aren't many of these out there, but they do exist).
I've attached a picture of a Martin next to a Besson, for reference. The Besson has an 11" bell and the Martin's is 11.5".
Two other cool features of these old Martin euphoniums:
-The upper register plays very well in-tune, with none of the extremely sharp notes that plague compensating euphoniums.
-Like older American tubas (and unlike any compensating euphonium I've played) they have usable "false tones." The three valve Martin pictured below can be played chromatically down to the pedal, using a false tone series starting on "low Eb."
-Funkhoss
I've attached a picture of a Martin next to a Besson, for reference. The Besson has an 11" bell and the Martin's is 11.5".
Two other cool features of these old Martin euphoniums:
-The upper register plays very well in-tune, with none of the extremely sharp notes that plague compensating euphoniums.
-Like older American tubas (and unlike any compensating euphonium I've played) they have usable "false tones." The three valve Martin pictured below can be played chromatically down to the pedal, using a false tone series starting on "low Eb."
-Funkhoss