Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
Northern
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:22 pm

Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)

Post by Northern »

Hello Troops,
Gene Pokorny here. I occasionally get myself over to tubenet and ITEA-on-line to see what some of the latest interest is in tubadom. It provides some interesting reading and also an interesting diversion when I should be spending time practicing long tones (and I get to read what other people write… when they should be spending time practicing long tones). Anyway, I feel like responding to an article written by Steve Marcus that has been recently printed in Philip Biggs’ outstanding periodical, “The Brass Herald.”
The main point of this letter is to affirm that I support the efforts that many companies now spend on developing new instruments, including efforts in copying the essential “stuff” of the York tubas that the Chicago Symphony owns. Both of those instruments are unique in their sound to this day. There have been valiant attempts at copying that sound and some manufacturers have come eerily close in those efforts. The fact is that the sound of the CSO York tubas are still unique.
I am the zookeeper for the York tubas and my chosen professional responsibility is to expose these instruments and have them tested against other copies whenever requested. I have done this numerous times over nearly three decades. Big Mouth Brass, Eastman, Hirsbrunner, Kanstul, Nirschl, St. Petersburg, Wessex, Yamaha, etc., etc., have come to Orchestra Hall, to sites at Ravinia and tests in Tokyo, Redlands, Luzern (Switzerland), and other places to do tests. Some of those tests are requested to be private. Some are public. No matter. If this will help out an end product, I am all for it.
Is it a cop-out for me to not say which instrument is closest to the York? Maybe. But I am truly conflicted as I tend to not part with any instruments. There are aspects of all of them that are commendable. Bedrooms in my house abound with instruments.
In fact, an attempted robbery at our house several years ago was abandoned once the robbers saw the multitude of tuba cases in the basement. Their cursory glance probably thought those cases were coffins. The robbers thought they had broken into John Wayne Gacy’s other home!! They ran.
Admittedly, I have a wonderful job in one of the finest orchestras on the planet. I have two beautiful instruments that I have the privilege of playing anytime I want and copies of those instruments many of which I have paid for myself. As long as there are manufacturers with a “sixth sense” that can capture the essence of the York sound, they are more than welcome to ask me to set up a test. I will do what I can do.
Cheers, Gene (AKA Northern)
Northern
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)

Post by Northern »

As long as I have the time and we have the appropriately large acoustical space, my willingness to keep doing this will continue. Thanks for your interest.

Somebody copied the article onto Facebook and then it was sent to me. Eventually a lot of articles in publications appear on the web. I have not even seen my personal copy of the "Brass Herald" this month. Actually, subscribing to the "Brass Herald" is a really great idea. There are wonderful articles therein. [See. It always happens. I should have been practicing my long tones!!!] Cheers, Northern
UDELBR
Deletedaccounts
Deletedaccounts
Posts: 1567
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 1:07 am

Re: Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)

Post by UDELBR »

Here 'tis.

Image
Chris Olka
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Re: Testing for York Copies (Brass Herald article)

Post by Chris Olka »

I just wanted to follow up on Gene’s post. This last June I was honored to work with him at his Seminar at Redlands University and got a chance to compare one of the 2 CSO Yorks to a number of other tubas. One of which I liked so much I bought it. I’ve played both of the CSO Yorks over the last few years and have personally owned multiple copies of a few of them by various manufacturers. I’ve reviewed all of the most recent versions on my YouTube channel and have to say that the level of all of these instruments is nothing short of incredible.

None of these would exist if it weren’t for Gene making the original progenitors of the “species” available to the intrepid souls that endeavor to replicate them...I for one can’t thank him enough for that. Because of his contributions to the art of tuba playing AND design I would have NEVER found my voice. THANK YOU GENE!!!

I too have been asked which of these is the “best”...to which I reply...”it’s personal preference” because they all have admirable and unique qualities. It’s truly exciting to be sitting on the front row, watching who will finally “crack the code” to unlocking the secret of the CSO York sound. After having played all of the copies along with the originals, there’s no question that there’s something special in those two horns...I suspect it has something to do with the fact that they’ve been played by two of the finest musicians that happen to play the tuba ever to grace the stage with an orchestra...

Finally, I wanted to take this opportunity to congratulate the two most recent entries to the field on having taken a previously almost unobtainable design and making it accessible to a MUCH broader cross-section of the tuba community without sacrificing the quality of sound and playing character of the original design. While not yet perfectly replicating the “magic” of the originals, they are bringing their own special “magic” and I can’t wait to see what they’ll do in the hands of our next generation of great musicians...food for thought...

Respectfully,
Chris Olka
Cincinnati Symphony
Post Reply